Medieval Manuscripts in Cambridge Libraries

A catalogue of Western manuscripts and papyri at Cambridge University Library, the Fitzwilliam Museum and selected Cambridge colleges

Cambridge, University Library, MS Nn.3.14

Diktyon no.: Diktyon 12244

Contents

Introduction: Nn.3.14 is a composite manuscript, now consisting of two parts: Part I, ff. 1r-121v; Part II, ff. 122r-209v. Both parts contain Euripides, Tragedies: Hecuba, Orestes and Phoenician Women. The second part also contains an extract from a grammatical treatise by Aelius Herodianus (2nd century AD). Part I belonged initially to a larger volume, the other parts of which are now represented by: CUL Nn.3.15.1 (ff. 50-114), CUL Nn.3.17.1 (ff. 1r-88v). The Greek text is cited in the editions of Euripides as Z for Part I, and as Zd for Part II. Dr Matteo Di Franco

Physical Description

Form: codex
Extent: Codex: iii + 209 + iii leaves. 207-217 × 145-155 mm. The lower edge of f. 121 and the outer edge of f. 154 are folded to conform with the present size of the manuscript (see also CUL Nn.3.17.1, f. 60r).
Foliation: Modern current foliation in pencil in Arabic numerals in the top right-hand corner, recto.
Foliation: There are few examples of a previous struck out foliation at the beginning of each text; this foliation is followed by the author of the description in A catalogue of the Manuscripts preserved in the Library of the University of Cambridge, and probably due to him. The outer margin of f. 154r was folded, and foliated as "157" on the recto side; the folio is now foliated as "154" on the verso side.

Collation

The manuscript consists of 28 quires: 18-2, 2-98, 108-1, 112, 126, 13-168, 178-4 | 18-288.

Binding

Binding with pale brown full skin covering over couched-laminate boards.

There is decorative tooling on boards, spine and on the board edge. Raised bands are worn-out, but a little trace of decorative tooling is preserved.

The title (Euripidis Hecuba Orestes Phoenissæ Hecuba Orestes) is tooled in gold on the spine.

Marbled paper is used as pastedowns with blank leaves.

220 × 175 × 57 mm.

History

Provenance and Acquisition

Three manuscripts - CUL MS Nn.3.14, CUL MS Nn.3.15 and CUL MS Nn.3.17 - all belonged to the physician Richard Mead (1673-1754) , who bought them on Mount Athos or from a dealer with access to Mt Athos monasteries (see CUL Nn.3.15). The original manuscript, made up of the parts now spread across the three classmarks, seems to have been divided before Mead bought it.

The manuscripts later entered the library of Anthony Askew (1722-1774) , physician and book collector.

After Askew's death, the manuscripts were sold by G. Leigh and J. Sotheby in the auction of his library in 1785 (Nn.3.14 Lot. n. 569), and eventually bought by Richard Farmer for Cambridge University Library. The University of Cambridge general bookplate (engraved by William Jackson in 1706-1707) was added on the front pastedown.

Part 1 [Cambridge, University Library, MS Nn.3.14, ff. 1r-121v]

Contents

Introduction: Part I used to belong to a larger volume combining the so-called 'late Byzantine triads' (canonical plays selected for the purpose of study in Byzantine schools) of the comedies of Aristophanes (now in CUL Nn.3.15.1, ff. 50-114), and tragedies of Euripides (Nn.3.14, ff. 1r-121v) and Aeschylus (now CUL Nn.3.17.1, ff. 1r-88v). A hypothesis of the original structure of the manuscript was made by Smith 1970, pp. 29-32. These manuscripts are regarded as representatives of the recensions (i.e. redactions) of Aristophanes, Euripides and Aeschylus by the Byzantine grammarian Thomas Magistros (13th-14th century). This manuscript was initially completed by the texts of Sophocles and Pindar in the recensio by Thomas Magistros in what is now Bibliotheca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat. gr. 1333 (+ Bibliotheca Apostolica Vaticana, Vat. gr. 1823, ff. 29r-37v). The first section comprises the triad Hecuba, Orestes and Phoenician Women, preceded by the Thoman Vita Euripidis and followed by the beginning of the Vita Aeschylis, which continues in CUL Nn.3.17.1, f. 1r. Part I is occasionally designated as Nn.3.14.1 in bibliography.

Language(s): Greek

1. ff. 1r-1v
Thomas Magistros , Thoman Vita Euripidis (n. 4 Dindorf, Scholia I 1863)
Incipit: f. 1r Εὐριπίδῃ τῷ ποιητῇ, γένος μὲν, Ἀθηναῖος· πατέρες δὲ Μνήσαρχος κάπηλος καὶ Κλειτὼ λαχανόπωλις· γεννηθεὶς δὲ ἐν Σαλαμῖνι τῇ πρὸ τῆς Ἀττικῆς νήσῳ
Explicit: f. 1v ἀπηγξάμην ἂν, ὥστ’ ἰδεῖν Εὐριπίδην. οὕτως ἡγοῦντο πολλοῦ τινος ἄξιον

TLG 5023.010

2.1. ff. 1v-2r
Thomas Magistros, Hypothesis on Hecuba followed by the list of characters of the play Thoman Argumentum Hecabae (Arg. 2 Dindorf, Scholia I 1863)
Incipit: f. 1v Μετὰ τὴν Τροίας ἅλωσιν ἄραντες οἱ Ἕλληνες καθωρμίσθησαν ἐν τῆ ἀντιπέραν Χερρονήσω τῆς Θρᾴκης ἧς Πολυμήστωρ ἦρχεν
Explicit: f. 2r Ἑκάβη περιεγένετο, ἐλέγξασα αὐτὸν ὡς τοῦ χρυσοῦ χάριν, καὶ οὐχ ὧν προὔτεινε τὸν παῖδα ἀνεῖλε, σύμψηφον σχοῦσα καὶ Ἀγαμέμνονα. Ἡ μὲν σκηνὴ τοῦ δράματος, ἀντίκειται ἐν τῆ ἀντιπέραν Χερρονήσω τῆς Τροίας· ἔστι δὲ τὰ πρόσωπα εἴδωλον Πολυδώρου Ἑκάβη Χορὸς ἐκ Τρωϊάδων αἰχμαλωτίδων Πολυξένη Ὀδυσσεύς Ταλθύβιος θεράπαινα Ἑκάβης||

TLG 5023.014

2.2. ff. 2r-32v
Euripides , Hecuba
Rubric: f. 2r Εὐριπίδου Ἑκάβης δραματουργία Εὐριπίδου Ἑκάβη
Incipit: f. 2v Ἥκω νεκρῶν κευθμῶνα καὶ σκότου πύλας λιπών ἵν’ Ἅδης χωρὶς ὤικισται θεῶν
Explicit: f. 33v τῶν δεσποσύνων πειρασόμεναι μόχθων· στερρὰ γὰρ ἀνάγκη
Final rubric: f. 33v Εὐριπίδου δράματος Ἑκάβης τέλος

Extensive scholia and interlinear glosses in red ink accompany the text.

Ff. 15r-15v have been added and written by Matthaeus Camariota, because of a loss of a leaf

The tragedy is repeated in the second part of the manuscript, ff. 122r-151v.

TLG 0006.040

3.1. ff. 32v-33r
Hypothesis on Orestes (Arg. 4 Dindorf, Scholia II 1863)
Incipit: f. 32v Ὅτε κατὰ τῶν Τρώων ἡ Ἑλλὰς ὥρμησεν Ἀγαμέμνων στρατηγὸς ᾑρέθη τοῦ στόλου παντὸς
Explicit: f. 33r ἐκ συμφορῶν εἰς εὐθυμίαν κατηντηκός· ἡ δὲ κωμωδία γέλωσι καὶ εὐφροσύναις ἐνύφανται: ἡ μὲν σκηνὴ τοῦ δράματος ὑπόκειται ἐν Ἄργει

Followed by the list of characters of the play.

TLG 5023.015

3.2. ff. 34v-77r
Euripides , Orestes
Rubric: Εὐριπίδου Ἠλέκτρα
Incipit: f. 34v Οὐκ ἔστιν οὐδὲν δεινὸν ὧδ’ εἰπεῖν ἔπος οὐδὲ πάθος οὐδὲ συμφορὰ θεήλατος
Explicit: f. 77r ὦ μέγα σεμνὴ νίκη τὸν ἐμὸν βίοτον κατέχοις καὶ μὴ λήγοις στεφανοῦσα
Final rubric: f. 77r Εὐριπίδου δράματος Ἠλέκτρας τέλος

Extensive scholia and interlinear glosses in red ink accompany the text.

The tragedy is repeated in the second part of the manuscript, ff. 154r-207v.

TLG 0006.049

4.1. ff. 77r-77v
Hypothesis on Phoenician Women (Arg. 5 Dindorf, Scholia ΙΙΙ 1863 = Arg. 18 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982)
Language(s): Greek
Incipit: f. 77r Ἁρπασθείσης Εὐρώπης ὑπὸ Διὸς γενομένου ταύρου καὶ μετακομισθείσης ἀπὸ Φοινίκης διὰ θαλάττης εἰς Κρήτην
Explicit: f. 70v καὶ καταλαβόντος τοῦ πολέμου, ἠναγκάσθησαν μένειν αὐτόθι· μέχρις ἂν ἡ μάχη λωφήσῃ

Followed by the list of characters of the play on lower margin of f. 78r

TLG 5023.016

4.2. ff. 78r-121v
Euripides , Phoenician Women
Rubric: f. 78r Εὐριπίδου Οἰδίπους
Incipit: f. 78r Ὦ τὴν ἐν ἄστροις οὐρανοῦ τέμνων ὁδὸν καὶ χρυσοκολλήτοισιν ἐμβεβὼς δίφροις
Explicit: f. 121v ὦ μέγα σεμνὴ νίκη τὸν ἐμὸν βίοτον κατέχοις καὶ μὴ λήγοις στεφανοῦσα
Final rubric: f. 121v εὐριπίδου δράματος οἰδίπου τέλος

Loss of text between f. 85v (ends l. 333: ἐπ’ αὐτόχειρά τε σφαγὰν ὑπὲρ τέραμνά) and f. 86r (starts l. 377: σκότον δεδορκώς; τί δὲ κασίγνηται δύο), as indicated by a note on lower margin of f. 85v: deest fol. (see Smith 1970, p. 31).

TLG 0006.048

5. f. 121v
Vita Aeschylis (ed. Page 1972)
Incipit: f. 121v Αἰσχύλος ὁ τραγικὸς γένει μὲν ἦν Ἀθηναῖος· Ἐλευσίνιος τῶν δήμων· υἱὸς Εὐφορίωνος· Κυνεγείρου ἀδελφός καὶ Ἀμεινίου
Explicit: f. 121v γνῶμαι δὲ ἢ συμπάθειαι ἢ ἄλλο τι τῶν δυναμένων εἰς δάκρυον ἀγαγεῖν οὐ πάνυ· ἄπῃρε δὲ||

The text continues on CUL Nn.3.17.1 f. 1r.

TLG 4141.001

6. f. 121v
Brief note on verbal inflection
Incipit: f. 121v συζυγία τῶν βαρυτόνων ῥημάτων ἕξ, ὧν ἡ μὲν πρώτη βῶ πῶ φῶ πτῶ· ἡ βα γῶ κῶ χῶ κτῶ
(cf. Dionysios Thrax, Ars grammatica TLG 0063.001)

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: ff. 1r-121v Western paper, folded in quarto. Watermarks: Nail ( 50 × 30 mm. ) near the gutter comparable to Briquet, Clou 4171 dated 1306-1325; Crown ( 40 × 60 mm. ) near the gutter comparable to Mošin-Traljić 1957, Filigranes des XIIIe et XIVe ss, Couronne 3200-5dated 1319-1324. (Different interpretations of watermarks in bibliography).

Collation

Part I of the manuscript consists of 17 quires:

  • Quire 18-2 ff. 1-6;
  • Quires 2-98 ff. 7-70;
  • 108-1 ff. 71-77;
  • 112 ff. 78-79;
  • 126 ff. 80-85 (now a senion, with one page lost and loss of text);
  • 13-168 ff. 86-117;
  • 178-4 ff. 118-121.

An early quire signature in Greek numerals, in dark brown ink, survives on quire 2 (f. 14v lower margin: ιε'); traces of quire signature, mostly lost to trimming, survive on quires 5 (f. 38v: ιη') 8 (f. 62v: κα') 9 (f. 70v: κβ'), probably original to the production of the manuscript (see Smith 1970, p. 29-31 on original quire signatures in CUL Nn.3.15.1, CUL NN.3.14 and CUL Nn.3.17.1).

Condition

In fair general condition. Leaves are yellow with age; there are extensive stains and worm holes.

The ruling almost cut the leaves, especially near the gutter, or caused cuts between the main text and the external margin (e.g. f. 59).

Tears are present on ff. 68 and 105.

Layout

Ff. 1r-121v: written space 170 × 70 mm. Scholia and prefatory materials that accompany the main texts have a very variable number of lines per page, and are arranged in a orderly manner.

Hand(s)

Hand A: ff. 1r-121v

The main texts are written in a mixed minuscule in an upright, scribal hand, in brown ink script.

There is a marked variation in letter size. Syllabic abbreviations and superscript word endings are rare, and usually appear only at the end of lines. Breathings are curved and mute iota is rarely used.

The small majuscules beta, gamma, eta, kappa and phi are present. Gamma and tau are often high. The majuscule beta has a curled bilobate shape, and epsilon is both regular minuscule and lunate. The sigma telikon is not present.

Phi-rho ligature is in two strokes and overlapping. Ligatures of tau with alpha or omicron are from the bottom, in a characteristic Z-shape.

Punctuation used includes the middle and upper point, lower comma and full stop.

Tails are occasionally flourished into the lower margins.

The same hand has written the interlinear glosses in red ink.

This hand is present in CUL Nn.3.15.1 (ff. 50r-75v, 76v-114r) and CUL Nn.3.17.1 (ff. 1r-88v), and designated as Hand B of the original manuscript (see Günther 1995).

Hand B: Ioannes Zeianos: ff. 1r-2r, Hypothesis on Hecuba and scholia.

The names of Ioannes Zeianos (PLP n. 6156) appears on CUL Nn.3.15.1, f. 89r and CUL Nn.3.17.1, f. 60v, as owner of the original manuscript. He is also designated as Hand C of the original manuscript (see Günther 1995)

His hand presents the main characteristics of the Fettaugen mode, performed with order and clarity, with numerous inclusions, large letters combined with others of smaller module.

On the identity of Ioannes Zeianos, see Smith 1992, p. 223-225.

Hand C: Matthaeus Camariota : ff. 15r-v, replacement.

The 15th-century erudit Matthaeus Camariota (RGK I 269) replaced one lost folio.

Hand D: ff. 32v-33r, ff. 77r-77v

The hypotheses on Orestes and on Phoenician Women are written in a mixed minuscule in an upright, scribal hand, in brown ink script.

There is a marked variation in letter size. Syllabic abbreviations and superscript word endings are common. Breathings are curved and mute iota is rarely used.

It seems to follow the same model as Zeianos, but in a very small size and with a much lower number of ligatures. The transcribed folios have a yellow grid above the writing.

This hand is present in CUL Nn.3.15.1 and CUL Nn.3.17.1, and designated as Hand D of the original manuscript (see Günther 1995).

Decoration

The beginning of the texts on ff. 1r, 33v and 78r are preceded by rectangular headpieces or vegetative ornament in red ink.

The texts on ff. 1r, 2v, 33v and 78r begin with an enlarged ornamental initial, outlined in red ink. Some initials are more ornate, with vegetative motives.

Thick red-ink initials mark the start of a new work or argument, and of most of the scholia.

History

Origin:

The manuscript was located at the Dionysiou Monastery of Mount Athos, and thanks to the name of Zeianos and the textual characteristics, it is possible to assume that it arrived there from Thessaloniki, and that it was produced in the scriptorium of Demetrius Triclinius , or in a scriptorium connected with him.

The characteristics of the script and the watermarks suggest that it was produced during the early 14th century, probably before 1325.

Part 2 (sometimes designated as Nn.3.14.2 in bibliography) [Cambridge, University Library, MS Nn.3.14, ff. 122r-209v ]

Contents

Introduction: The second part was added to the first without any manifest intention of supplementing the text. The tragedies Hecuba and Orestes in the Thoman recension, constituting the Byzantine dyad, are repeated from the first part and followed by an extract from the treatise On enclitics by Aelius Herodianus.

Language(s): Greek

7. ff. 122r-151v
Euripides , Hecuba
Incipit: f. 122r Ἥκω νεκρῶν κευθμῶνα καὶ σκότου πύλας λιπών ἵν’ Ἅδης χωρὶς ὤικισται θεῶν
Explicit: f. 151v τῶν δεσποσύνων πειρασόμεναι μόχθων· στερρὰ γὰρ ἀνάγκη

Interlinear glosses accompany the text intermittently.

TLG 0006.040

7. ff. 152r-152v
Blank
8.1. ff. 153r-153v
Hypothesis on Orestes (Arg. 1 Dindorf, Scholia II 1863)
Incipit: f. 153r Ὀρέστης τὸν φόνον τοῦ πατρὸς μεταπορευόμενος ἀνεῖλεν Αἴγισθον καὶ Κλυταιμνήστραν
Explicit: f. 153r Ὀρέστην δὲ καὶ Ἑρμιόνην ἐπέταξε λαβεῖν· Πυλάδης δὲ Ἠλέκτραν συνοικίσαι, καθαρθέντι δὲ τοῦ φόνου Ἄργους ἄρχειν ἠξιώθησαν

Followed by the list of characters of the play.

TLG 5023.015

8.2. ff. 153r-153v
Hypothesis on Orestes (Arg. 2 Dindorf, Scholia II 1863) Hypothesis on Orestes of Aristophanes of Byzantium
Incipit: f. 153r Ἄλλως· Ὀρέστης διὰ τὴν τῆς μητρὸς σφαγὴν ἅμα δὲ καὶ ὑπὸ τῶν Ἐρινύων δειματούμενος
Explicit: f. 153v Τὸ δρᾶμα τῶν ἐπὶ σκηνῆς εὐδοκιμούντων· χείριστον δὲ τοῖς ἤθεσι· πλὴν γὰρ Πυλάδου πάντες φαῦλοι ἦσαν

Followed by the list of characters of the play.

TLG 5023.015

8.3. ff. 154r-207v
Euripides , Orestes
Rubric: f. 154r Εὐριπίδου Ὀρέστης
Incipit: f. 154r Οὐκ ἔστιν οὐδὲν δεινὸν ὧδ’ εἰπεῖν ἔπος οὐδὲ πάθος οὐδὲ συμφορὰ θεήλατος
Explicit: f. 207v ὦ μέγα σεμνὴ νίκη τὸν ἐμὸν βίοτον κατέχοις καὶ μὴ λήγοις στεφανοῦσα
Final rubric: f. 207v Τέλος Ὀρέστου δράματος Εὐριπίδου

Scholia and interlinear glosses accompany the text.

TLG 0006.049

9. ff. 208r-209r
Aelius Herodianus , On enclitics De enclisi (ed. Lentz 1867; cf. Dickey 2014, p. 332-333)

Defective at the end

Rubric: f. 208r Ἡροδιανοῦ περὶ ἐγκλινομένων καὶ ἐγκλιτικῶν καὶ συνεγκλιτικῶν μορίων
Incipit: f. 208r Ἐγκλινόμενόν ἐστι μόριον λέξις κατὰ τὸ τέλος ὀξυνομένη τρέπουσα δὲ εἰς βαρεῖαν κατὰ τὴν τοῦ λόγου σύνταξιν
Explicit: f. 209r Αἱ δὲ ποτὲ μὲν ἐγείρουσαι τὴν πρὸ αὑτῶν ποτὲ δὲ μή σεῦ σέο σοῦ σοί||

TLG 0087.002

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: ff. 122r-209v Western paper, folded in quarto. Unidentified watermark on the innermost bifolium of quires near the gutter.

Collation

Part II of the manuscript consists of 11 quaternions: quires 18-288 ff. 122-209

Quire signatures in Greek numerals, in dark brown ink, survive on quires:

  • 19 (f. 130r top margin, right corner: μα);
  • 23 (f. 169v lower margin: με);
  • 24 (f. 170r top margin: μϛ);
  • 25 (f. 178r top margin: μζ);
  • 28 (f. 202r top margin: ν).
They are probably original to the production of the manuscript.

Traces of quire signatures, mostly lost to trimming, survive on quires:

  • 20 (f. 138r top margin: μβ);
  • 21 (f. 146r: μγ);
  • 22 (f. 154r: μδ);
  • 23 (f. 162r: με);
  • 27 (f. 194r: μθ).

Condition

In good general condition. Leaves are yellow with age and some stains.

Layout

Ff. 122r-151v, ff. 154r-207v: written space 160 × 100 mm.

Ff. 153r-v: written space 170 × 105 mm.

Ff. 208r-209r: written space 160 × 120 mm.

Hand(s)

Hand A: ff. 122r-151v, ff. 154r-207v

The main texts are written in a mixed minuscule in an upright script, in brown ink.

This hand shows cursive-like ductus which becomes more poised from f. 169v. It is distinguished by a marked variation in letter size and several majuscule letters (beta, gamma, delta, eta, lambda, pi, phi), often enlarged, as well as the omega. The majuscule beta has a large bilobed shape, and the tau, in large dimension, has a loop shape. The ligatures are frequent, and those with omega or alpha are from the bottom.

Syllabic abbreviations and superscript word endings usually appear only at the end of lines, but occasionally elsewhere.

Tails are occasionally flourished into the lower margins

Hand B: ff. 153r-v.

The Hypothesis on Orestes is written in mixed minuscule in an upright script, in brown ink.

This hand has a poised ductus. Based on the model of the Hand A, it is more tidy and airy. It has the same capital letters and characteristic shapes.

Hand C: ff. 208r-209r.

The text of Herodianus is written in a mixed minuscule which shows a poised ductus, and seems to be based on the model of the Hand B, but Hand C does not use the characteristic shapes for beta and tau.

History

Origin: In the absence of any identification of watermarks and hands, the palaeographic features of Part II suggest a date no earlier than the 15th century.

Additional Information

Record Sources

Description (2019) draws on A catalogue of the Manuscripts preserved in the Library of the University of Cambridge, vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1861, pp. 482-484.

Availability

Entry to read in the Library is permitted only on presentation of a valid reader's card. For information on eligibility and admissions procedures, see Joining the Library). For further enquiries, and to confirm the availability of the manuscript, please contact the Special Collections Reading Room.

Bibliography

    A Preliminary Skeleton List of the Manuscripts of Euripides The Classical Quarterly, Spranger, J. A. (33, 2, 98-107, 1939) The Byzantine manuscript tradition of the tragedies of Euripides, Turyn, Alexander (Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1957) Notes and observations on some manuscripts of the scholia on Aeschylus Classica et mediaevalia, Smith, Ole Langwitz (31, 14-48, 1970) Observations on the activities of the Byzantine grammarians of the Palaeologian era. II, the impact of Thomas Magistros's introductory matter (Vita, hypotheseis) to the Euripidean Triad (including an excursus on Copenhagen, Gamle Kongelige Samling 3549, 8°), Schartau, Bjarne (Odense, Odense University Press, 1973) Studien zur Textüberlieferung der Hekabe des Euripides, Matthiessen, Kjeld (Heidelberg, C. Winter, 1974) On the Problem of a Thoman Recension of Aristophanes Greek, Roman, and Byzantine Studies, Smith, Ole Langwitz (17, 1, 75-80, 1976) Anthony Askew's "Liber amicorum" Transactions of the Cambridge Bibliographical Society, Stubbings, Frank (6, 5, 306-321, 1976) Griechische Kodikologie und Textüberlieferung, Harlfinger, Dieter (Darmstadt, Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 1980) Repertorium der griechischen Kopisten, 800-1600. I. Grossbritannien Veröffentlichungen der Kommission für Byzantinistik ;, Gamillscheg, ErnstHarlfinger, Dieter (Wien, Bd. 3, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1981) The textual tradition of Euripides' Phoinissai, Mastronarde, Donald J (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983) Tricliniana II Classica et mediaevalia, Smith, Ole Langwitz (43, 187-229, 1992) The manuscripts and the transmission of the Paleologan scholia on the Euripidean triad, Günther, Hans Christian (Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1995) From Britain to Byzantium: the study of Greek manuscripts Through the looking glass: Byzantium through British eyes : papers from the twenty-ninth Spring Symposium of Byzantine Studies, London, March 1995 Society for the Promotion of Byzantine Studies publications, Easterling, P. E. (Aldershot, Ashgate, 2000) A catalogue of works attributed to the grammarian Herodian Classical Philology, Dickey, Eleanor (109, 4, 325-345, 2014)

Funding of Cataloguing

The Polonsky Foundation

Digital Images

Cambridge Digital Library