Medieval Manuscripts in Cambridge Libraries

A catalogue of Western manuscripts and papyri at Cambridge University Library, the Fitzwilliam Museum and selected Cambridge colleges

Cambridge, University Library, MS Mm.1.11

Diktyon no.: Diktyon 12225

Contents

Introduction: This mid-14th century working text manuscript transmits the so-called 'Byzantine triad' of three plays of Euripides (b. c. 480, d. 406 BC), selected for study in Byzantine schools: Hecuba, Orestes and Phoenician Women. The first section (ff. 1r-33v) comprises Hecuba and Orestes ll. 1-133, and the text follows the recension (i.e. redaction) of the Byzantine grammarian Manuel Moschopoulus (13th-14th century; see Turyn (1957), p. 123-124). The second section (ff. 34r-107v) contains Orestes ll. 134-end and Phoenician Women, in the recension of Byzantine grammarian Thomas Magistros (13th-14th century), and is accompanied by scholia of the same scholar. The order of quires from ff. 41r to 68v is inverted, and an English hand has noted the order of lines. Richard Porson , Regius Professor of Greek at Cambridge (b. 1759, d. 1808), used this manuscript (siglum Cant) in his edition of Euripides' tragedies (see the second edition, 1802). J. Diggle designated the manuscript with siglum Mm in his edition of Phoenician Women (Oxford, 1994); the manuscript is also designated as Zx for scholia by Günther (1995). The fragments that are now Cambridge, University Library, MS Add. 2753.1 once served as endleaves to this manuscript before the present binding. Dr Matteo Di Franco

Language(s): Greek

1.1. f. [i] recto
Libanius, Excerpt from Libanius, Ep. 992 Foerster
Incipit: || f. [i] recto ἐπειδὴ μέγα μὲν ἀγαθὸν ἰατρὸς ἀγαθὸς πόλει μέλει δέ σοι τῆς τῶν πόλεων εὐδαιμονίας
Explicit: f. [i] recto σὲ δὲ ἀναγνῶναι· τάχα γὰρ ἄν τι τούτοις καὶ ἀκολουθήσειεν||

Interlinear glosses supplied the text. On l. 3 a later hand added the incomplete formula ὦ Χριστέ βοήθει μοι τῶ σῶ

TLG 2200.001

1.2. ff. [i] verso - [ii] verso
A note in Spanish, monocondylia, four decorated letters, and sketches,

f. [i] verso Note: ‘ Zuan Antonio Veso Anabonaventura amolere ’

2.1. f. 1r
Hypothesis on Hecabe
Rubric: f. 1r εὐριπίδου βίβλος
Incipit: f. 1r Μετὰ τὴν ἰλίου πολιορκίαν, οἱ μὲν ἕλληνες εἰς τὰ ἀντιπέρα τῆς τρωάδος χερρόνησον καθωρμίσθησαν
Explicit: f. 5v ἐκρίθη γὰρ οὐκ ἄρχειν ὠμοτάτος ἀμύνασθαι τὸν κατάρξαντα

TLG 5023.001

2.2. f. 1r
Characters of the play
Rubric: f. 1r τὰ τοῦ δράματος πρόσωπα
2.3. ff. 1v-30r
Euripides, Hecabe
Incipit: f. 1v Ἥκω νεκρῶν κευθμῶνα καὶ σκότου πύλας
Explicit: f. 30r τῶν δεσποσύνων πειρασόμεναι μόχθων· στερρὰ γὰρ ἀνάγκη

The main text is supplied by extensive scholia, and interlinear glosses in red ink

the top half of f. 6 has been torn away, with loss of text

TLG 0006.040

3.1. f. 30r
Hypothesis on Orestes
Incipit: f. 30r Ὀρέστης τὸν φόνον τοῦ πατρὸς μεταπορευόμενος ἀνεῖλεν Αἴγισθον καὶ Κλυταιμνήστραν
Explicit: f. 30r Ὀρέστην δὲ καὶ Ἑρμιόνην ἐπέταξε λαβεῖν· Πυλάδης δὲ Ἠλέκτραν συνοικίσαι, καθαρθέντι δὲ τοῦ φόνου Ἄργους ἄρχειν

TLG 5023.015

3.2. ff. 30r-30v
Hypothesis on Orestes (Arg. 2 Dindorf, Scholia II 1863) Hypothesis of Aristophanes of Byzantium
Incipit: f. 30r Ἄλλως· Ὀρέστης διὰ τὴν τῆς μητρὸς σφαγὴν ἅμα δὲ καὶ ὑπὸ τῶν Ἐρινύων δειματούμενος
Explicit: f. 30v Τὸ δρᾶμα τῶν ἐπὶ σκηνῆς εὐδοκιμούντων· χείριστον δὲ τοῖς ἤθεσι· πλὴν γὰρ Πυλάδου πάντες φαῦλοι ἦσαν

Followed by the list of characters of the play

παρ’ οὐδετέρῳ δὲ κεῖται ἡ μυθοποιία (Dindorf, Scholia II 1863, p. 5 ll. 3-4) is omitted. F. 30v begins at ἡ μὲν σκηνὴ, with a partially vanished decorated letter

TLG 5023.015

3.3. ff. 30v-70v
Euripides, Orestes
Rubric: f. 30v ἀρχὴ τοῦ βου δράματος
Incipit: f. 30v Οὐκ ἔστιν οὐδὲν δεινὸν ὧδ’ εἰπεῖν ἔπος οὐδὲ πάθος οὐδὲ συμφορὰ θεήλατος
Explicit: f. 70v ὦ μέγα σεμνὴ νίκη τὸν ἐμὸν βίοτον κατέχοις καὶ μὴ λήγοις στεφανοῦσα
Final rubric: f. 70v εὐριπίδου δράματος ὄρεστου τέλος

From f. 34r (l. 134) starts Hand B, without loss of text

the order of quires 6, 7, and 8 from ff. 41r to 68v is inverted; the right order of folios is: ff.

  • 40v (ends l. 413 Diggle),
  • 61r-68v (ll. 414-737),
  • 53r-60v (ll. 738-1045),
  • 41r-52v (ll. 1046-1600),
  • 69r (starts l. 1601)

from f. 30v to 33v (ll. 1-133) the text follows the Moschopoulean recension; scholia as well are Moschopoulean (incipit on f. 30v Πάθος έπὶ σώματος τὸ τραῦμα καὶ ἡ πληγὴ Σ2 Dindorf, Scholia II 1863). From f. 34r to 70v the text follows the Thoman recension

TLG 0006.049

4.1. f. 70v
Prefatory Material to Phoenician Women The riddle of the Sphinx (Arg. 6 Dindorf, Scholia ΙΙΙ 1863 = Arg. 5 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982 = e ed. Diggle 1994)
Incipit: f. 70v Τὸ τῆς σφιγγὸς αἴνιγμα. Ἔστι δίπουν ἐπὶ γῆς καὶ τετράπον οὗ μία φωνὴ
Explicit: f. 70v ἔνθα τάχος γυίοισιν ἀφαυρότατον πέλει αὐτοῦ

Originally a scholion (Σ50)

TLG 5023.016

4.2. f. 70v
Prefatory Material to Phoenician Women Answer to the riddle of the Sphinx (Σ50 Dindorf 1863 = Arg. 6 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982 = f ed. Diggle 1994)
Incipit: f. 70v Τὴν δὲ λύσιν τοῦ αἰνίγματος οὕτως φασί τινες εἰρῆσθαι· κλῦθι καὶ οὐκ ἐθέλουσα κακόπτερε μοῦσα θανόντων
Explicit: f. 70v αὐχένα φορτίζων· γήραϊ καμπτόμενος

Originally a scholion (Σ50)

TLG 5023.016

4.3. f. 71r
Prefatory Material to Phoenician Women Genealogy from Io to the sons of Oedipus (Σ291 Dindorf 1863 = Arg. 10 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982)
Incipit: f. 71r ἀπὸ τῆς ἰοῦς ἔπαφος· ἀπὸ τοῦ ἐπάφου λιβύη· ἀπὸ τῆς λιβῦης βῆλος
Explicit: f. 71r ἀπὸ τοῦ oἰδίποδος ἐτεοκλῆς καὶ πολυνείκης

Originally a scholion (Σ291)

TLG 5023.016

4.4. f. 71r
Prefatory Material to Phoenician Women Hypothesis on Phoenician Women (Arg. 1 Dindorf 1863 = Arg. 1 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982 = a ed. Diggle 1994)
Rubric: f. 71r Ὑπόθεσις φοινι⟨σ⟩σῶν
Incipit: f. 71r ⟨Ἐ⟩τεοκλῆς παραλαβὼν τὴν θηβῶν βασιλείαν, ἀποστερεῖ τοῦ μέρους τὸν ἀδελφὸν πολυνείκην
Explicit: f. 71r Οἰδίπουν δὲ, φυγάδα τῆς πατρίδος ἀπέπεμψεν, ἐπὶ μὲν ἐτεοκλέους φυλάξας τὸν ἀνθρώπινον νόμον· ἐπὶ δὲ πολυνείκην απ ανθρώπους[sic] διατεθεὶς οὐδὲ παρὰ τὴν δυστυχίαν ἐλεήσας

TLG 5023.016

4.5. f. 71r
Prefatory Material to Phoenician Women (Arg. 3 Dindorf = Arg. 2 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982 = b ed. Diggle 1994)
Incipit: f. 71r Περιπαθεῖς ἄγαν ἐστὶν αὕτη ἡ τραγωδία· ἀπώλετο γὰρ ὁ κρέοντος υἱὸς· ἀπὸ τοῦ τείχους ὑπὲρ τῆς πόλεως ἀποθανών
Explicit: f. 71r ἔστη[sic] δὲ τὸ δρᾶμα καὶ πολυπρόσωπον· καὶ γνωμῶν πολλῶν μεστὸν καὶ καλλῶν

TLG 5023.016

4.6. f. 71r
Prefatory Material to Phoenician Women Apollo's oracle to Laios (Arg. 6 Dindorf = Arg. 4 Mastronarde-Bremer 1982 = d ed. Diggle 1994)
Incipit: f. 71r Λάϊε λαβδακίδη παίδων γένος ὄλβιον αἰτεῖς· τέξεις μὲν φίλον υἱὸν· ἀτὰρ τόδε σοι μόρος ἔσται
Explicit: f. 71r οὗ φίλον ἥρπασας υἱόν· ὁ δ’ ηὔξατό σοι τάδε πάντα

TLG 5023.016

4.7. f. 71r
Scholion to the Orestes added by a later hand (Σ1691 Dindorf, Scholia ΙΙ 1863)
Incipit: f. 71r Ἡ κατάληξις τῆς τραγωδίας ἢ εἰς θρῆνον ἢ εἰς πάθος καταλήγει
Explicit: f. 71r ὑπομνήματος ὁλοσχερῶς καὶ τῶν μικτῶν

TLG 5023.016

4.8. ff. 71v-107v
Euripides, Phoenician Women
Rubric: f. 71v ἀρχὴ τοῦ Γ' δράματος
Incipit: f. 71v Ὦ τὴν ἐν ἄστροις οὐρανοῦ τέμνων ὁδὸν καὶ χρυσοκολλήτοισιν ἐμβεβὼς δίφροις
Explicit: f. 107v ὦ μέγα σεμνὴ νίκη τὸν ἐμὸν βίοτον κατέχοις καὶ μὴ λήγοις στεφανοῦσα
Final rubric: f. 107v τέλος δράματος φοινισσῶν εὐριπίδου

Prefixed the list of characters of the play

the text follows the Thoman recension; scholia as well are Thoman (incipit on f. 71v ταῦτα πάντα πρὸς τὸν ἥλιον ἀποτείνει ἰοκάστη δυσχεραίνουσα διὰ τὰ συμβάντα Σ1 Dindorf III, 1863)

a portion of f. 105 was cut away, with loss of text on f. 105v (text integrated in margin on f. 105r)

TLG 0006.048

5. f. 107v
Metrical epigram DBBE type 2150
Incipit: f. 107v ὥσπερ ξένοι χαίρουσιν ἰδεῖν πατρίδα καὶ οἱ θαλαττεύοντες ἰδεῖν λιμένα οὕτω καὶ οἱ γράφοντες ἰδεῖν βιβλίου τέλος
(cf. DBBE type 2148 and type 2150)
6.1. f. 108r
Illegible text of one line in red ink
6.2. f. 108r
Five lines text crossed out; two names legible
Incipit: || f. 108r στρατηγόπουλος καὶ εὐφημιανός
6.3. f. 108r
Brief notes on verbal inflection
6.4. f. 108r
Invocation
Incipit: f. 108r Ὦ Χριστέ βοήθει μοι τῶ σῶ δούλω Ἰωάννη Στρατηγόπουλω

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: ff. 1r-108r Western paper, folded in octavo. Watermarks: Pot ( 70 × 35 mm. ) on the gutter comparable to Briquet, 12468-9 ; Homme ou Femme, Forgeron ( 85 × 65 mm. ) on the gutter, comparable to Briquet, 7556 . The majority of those examples are dated to the middle of the 14th century. Conjoint outermost bifolio of quires 1, 5, and 7: ff. [i] recto and 8r, 33r and 40r, 53r and 60r These folios were added to quires 1, 5, and 7 to fill the loss of original folios. Western paper, folded in octavo. Watermark: Monts ( 40 × 90 mm. ) near the spine comparable to Harlfinger, Monts 72-89 and Briquet, Monts 11853-72 . The majority of those examples are dated from the end of the 14th century and the first half of the 15th century.
Extent: Codex: ii + ii + 108 + ii leaves., 210 × 140 mm.
Foliation: [a-b] + i-ii + 1-108 + [c-d]. Modern foliation in pencil in Arabic numerals in the top right-hand corner, recto.

Collation

The manuscript consists of 13 quires: 11 quaternions, one quinion and one sexternion. The order of quires 6, 7, and 8 (ff. 41r-68v) is inverted (see above).

  • 2 paper flyleaves (18th century)
  • Quire 110 ff. [i] recto-24v
  • Quire 2-58 ff. 9r-40v
  • Quire 612 ff. 41r-52v
  • Quires 7-138 ff. 53r-108v

Traces of some quire signatures:

  • γον (f. 8v) by the hand of replacement (partially lost to trimming);
  • δεύτερον in monocondylion (ff. 9r and 16v);
  • τρίτον in monocondylion (f. 24v.

A discontinuous sequence of quire signatures in pencil in Arabic numerals is added in the bottom right-and corner of the first folio, recto of quires 2-3, 5-11:

ff. 9r, 17r, 33r, 41r, 53r, 61r, 69r, 77r, 85r. The sequence reflects the current state of the manuscript.

Condition

In generally fair condition. The top half of f. 6 is torn away, with loss of text; portion of the outer margin of f. 96r is cut away, with loss of scholia; f. 101r is torn in two and a portion of margin cut away, with likely loss of scholia; a scrap of f. 105r (height 40 mm, width 90 mm) is cut away, with loss of text (added in margin on f. 105r).

Due to a loss of original outermost bifolios of quires 1, 5, and 7, ff. [i] recto and 8r, 33r and 40r, 53r and 60r) were substituted in the mid-15th century with cleaner western paper.

There are occasional stains, worm holes, and some water damage.

Layout

Ff. 1r-108v: written space 175 × 115 mm. Main text between 15 and 24 lines per page. The scholia that accompany the main text have a very variable number of lines per page and the arrangement is rarely (e.g. f. 61r) disorganized, because of the overlap of interventions.

Hand(s)

Hand A: ff. 1r-33v, 40r-v, 53r-v, 60r-v.

The main text is a mixed minuscule in an upright, scribal hand, in brown ink script.

There is moderate variation in letter size. Syllabic abbreviations and superscript word endings usually appear only at the end of lines, but occasionally elsewhere (common abbreviation of μεν). Breathings are curved and mute iota is absent. The double grave accent is in frequent use.

The small majuscules beta, gamma, eta, phi are present. Ny is in modern shape, gamma is occasionally high. Theta is both in open and round form, with a point in the horizontal stroke. The sigma telikon is used along with regular sigma in end of words.

Ligatures of kappa with alpha or omega are from the bottom; tau rho ligature in three strokes and overlapping.

Punctuation used includes the middle and upper point, lower comma and full stop.

The same hand has written the interlinear glosses and the name of characters in abbreviation in red ink.

Hand B: ff. 34r-39v, 41r-52v, 54r-59v, 61r-107v.

The main text is a mixed minuscule in an upright, scribal hand, in brown ink script. Letter size varies frequently. Syllabic abbreviations and superscript word endings are not limited to the end of lines.

Breathings are curved, circumflex accent is normaly not linked to omega, except in rare cases (e.g. f. 71r). Mute iota is absent.

The majuscules beta, gamma, kappa phi are widely used. Gamma is occasionally high. Beta and omega are large; sigma telikon is not used.

Phi and rho are ligated and overlapping (e.g. φορτίζων f. 70v l. 22). Inclusions of letters within omicron are present.

Punctuation used includes the middle and upper point, lower comma and full stop.

Decoration

The tragedies and the argumenta are preceded by headpieces in red ink (f. 1v), with birds (f. 30r) or rectangular headpiece with vegetative ornament in red ink (f. 30v) or brown ink (f. 71v).

The thick red-ink major initials in floral pattern mark the start of a new work or argument, and of most of the scholia in ff. 1-33 (see f. 26v). In f. 30r an head replaces an omicron.

Minor initials written in a thin red-ink uncial within the body of the text.

The manuscript contains sketches drawn in pale brown or red ink in the margins of ff. 7v; human figures: 14r, 14v; birds: 24v; 26v, 30r, 55r.

Additions

The order of quires 6, 7, and 8 (ff. 41r-68v) is inverted, and an English hand tried to restore the order of lines referring to Joshua Barnes' edition (1694): ff. 40v, 41r, 52v, 53r, 60v, 61r, 68v, 69r.

Binding

18th-century binding with pale brown full velvet covering over couched-laminate boards, with plain pastedowns. There is decorative tooling; traces of decorative tooling are present on the board edge.

The title (Euripides Mss) and the classmark are tooled in gold on the spine.

218 × 154 × 33 mm.

History

Origin:

The watermarks suggest that the core of the manuscript was produced in Italy in the middle of the 14th century, and that it was restored between the end of the 14th century and the first half of the 15th century.

The characteristics of the scripts indicate that it was produced during the later 14th or earlier 15th century.

Probably the manuscript was produced in different stages, as a working text, and the constituent parts mixed with replacements (cf. Günther 1995, p. 103).

Provenance and Acquisition

Owned by Jean-Baptiste Hautin (b. 1580?, d. 1640), who added his ex libris on the front pastedown, and ‘ Euripides ’ and on the inner margin ‘ manuscrit oriental tres ancien ’. The manuscript had probably belonged to the French Royal collection, but it left the collection before 1622, when Nicolas Rigault compiled his catalogue.

The manuscript contains the bookplate engraved by John Pine in 1736, to commemorate the donation of books from the library of John Moore (1646-1714), bishop of Ely by George I . However, the manuscript has not been traced among records of Moore's library (either Bernard, Catalogi librorum manuscriptorum Angliæ et Hiberniæ (c. 1697) or the handwritten supplementary list of Moore's manuscripts, now CUL Oo.7.50.2, compiled by Thomas Tanner (1674-1735) ). A considerable number of books that bear Hautin's name were owned by Moore and came to the Library via George I, so, although conclusive proof is lacking, this seems the most plausible explanation of the book's history.

Additional Information

Record Sources

Description (2019) draws on A catalogue of the Manuscripts preserved in the Library of the University of Cambridge, vol. 4, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1861, p. 105-106.

Availability

Entry to read in the Library is permitted only on presentation of a valid reader's card. For information on eligibility and admissions procedures, see Joining the Library). For further enquiries, and to confirm the availability of the manuscript, please contact the Special Collections Reading Room.

Bibliography

    A catalogue of the manuscripts preserved in the library of the University of Cambridge, (Cambridge, 4: Ll-Oo, Cambridge University Press, 1861) The Byzantine manuscript tradition of the tragedies of Euripides, Turyn, Alexander (Urbana, University of Illinois Press, 1957) Observations on the activities of the Byzantine grammarians of the Palaeologian era. II, the impact of Thomas Magistros's introductory matter (Vita, hypotheseis) to the Euripidean Triad (including an excursus on Copenhagen, Gamle Kongelige Samling 3549, 8°), Schartau, Bjarne (Odense, Odense University Press, 1973) The textual tradition of Euripides' Phoinissai, Mastronarde, Donald J (Berkeley, University of California Press, 1983) The manuscripts and the transmission of the Paleologan scholia on the Euripidean triad, Günther, Hans Christian (Stuttgart, Franz Steiner Verlag, 1995) Byzantium and the revival of learning Greek Scripts: an illustrated introduction, Easterling, P. (London, 51-63, 2001) The Greek Manuscripts of John Moore and Etienne Baluze Codices Manuscripti, Jackson, Donald F. (56/57, 29-42, 2006)

Funding of Cataloguing

The Polonsky Foundation

Digital Images

Cambridge Digital Library