Medieval Manuscripts in Cambridge Libraries

A catalogue of Western manuscripts and papyri at Cambridge University Library, the Fitzwilliam Museum and selected Cambridge colleges

Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.5.23

Diktyon no.: Diktyon 12004

Contents

Introduction: This manuscript is a Miscellany of Greek texts copied by Henri II Estienne, Henry Scrimgeour, and Patrick Young. The manuscript is probably a composite, formed of various parts which were originally independent and were copied at different times. However, since it is now not possible to ascertain the quire structure, and to distinguish, for instance, different kinds of paper, it is described here as a whole. Trinity MS O.5.23 is described in James' catalogue as containing ‘ H. Scrimger's Collections’: this is, however, a limited description of this codex. Only a few leaves can be assigned to Scrimgeour (or Scrimger, 1505?-1572), ff. 66r-68v, where the Scottish diplomat and book collector copied an extract from Photius' Bibliotheca about Helladius. Besides this, the volume contains transcriptions and notes made by another important figure in the 16th-century scholarly milieu: the French printer and classical scholar Henri II Estienne (Henricus Stephanus, 1531-1598). By his hand are written, for example, a series of transcriptions and notes on Lucian. Occasionally he indicated his exemplars: there are a codex ‘ Abbatiae’ (see f. 27v), a codex ‘ Scipionis quod fuit Argyropyli’ (see f. 15r), and a codex ‘ D. Marci quod fuit Georgii Anto. Vespucii’ (see f. 32r: on the basis of the content, of the ownership by the convent of S Marco and by Giorgio Antonio Vespucci, this codex could be Florence, Biblioteca Medicea Laurenziana, Plut. 57.13). Other texts were written later, by the great-nephew of Scrimgeour, Patrick Young (or Junius, 1584-1652); among them on ff. 74v-75v he copied four inscriptions, one was on a stone originally in St James's Park, Westminster, and is now lost; another is an epitaph of his father Peter Young, who died in 1628. Dr Erika Elia

Language(s): Greek and Latin

1. ff. 2r-40v
Transcriptions and notes on Lucian
Incipit: f. 2r Σαμοσατεὺς· οὕτως· ἐν τῷ πῶς δεῖ ἱστορίαν
Explicit: f. 40v Χαρίδημος ἢ περὶ κάλλους.

On f. 2r there is a note on the text, saying that Scrimgeour copied the extracts from various manuscripts and a printed book in Florence: ‘ H. Scrimgerus haec aliunde descripsit ex codicibus Abbatiae cuiusdam, Florentino impresso, Scipionis qui fuit Arguropyli[sic], D. Marci G. Vespucii’; the text, however, was copied almost entirely by Henry II Estienne (see Hands)

From f. 4v, where another scribe (Henry Estienne) copied the text, there are also translations of words and expressions in Latin, notes and scholia

Ff. 41r-41v are blank

2. ff. 42r-43v
Oneirocriticon
Incipit: f. 42r Βασιλεῖ προσλαλῶν τις ἄπρακτος μένει· βαιλεύς
Explicit: f. 43v ὕδωρ πίνων πηλῶδες, ἐν λύπαις ἔσῃ
Final rubric: f. 43v Τέλος

On f. 42r, in the left margin, there is a note in black ink by another hand (probably Patrick Young) about the text: ‘ Edita sunt haec ἀλφαβητικῶς sub nomine Astrampsychi ’: the text however does not correspond to Astrampsychus' Oneirocriticon as printed in Artemidori Daldiani et Achmetis Sereimi F. Oneirocritica. Astrampsychi et Nicephori versus etiam Oneirocritici. Nicolai Rigaltii ad Artemidorum Notae, Paris 1603

The text is organised in brief phrases, the subjects are written in red in the margin, and they are arranged alphabetically; a few phrases correspond, with some differences, to F. Drexl, 'Das Traumbuch des Patriarchen Germanos', in: Λαογραφία 7 (1923), pp. 433-448

3. ff. 44r-44v
Variae lectiones in Lucianum
Rubric: f. 44r Variae lectiones in Lucianum
Incipit: f. 44r Περὶ τοῦ ἐνυπνίου ἤτοι βίος Λουκιάνου
Explicit: f. 44v ἀποβαλλομένους αὐτῆς ἕνεκα πάντα

ff. 45r-49r are blank

4. ff. 49v-51r
Transcription of three inscriptions

In the manuscript, the text of the inscription has been transcribed without breathings and accents

The text has been written perpendicular to the normal direction of the script

ff. 51v-56v are blank

4.1. ff. 49v-50r
Decree of demos (of Smyrna) concerning sympoliteia with Magnesia (Sip.) and relations with King Seleukos (II), 245/243? BC; probably from Smyrna
Incipit: f. 49v Ἔδοξεν τῷ δήμῳ στρατηγῶν γνώμῃ ἐπειδὴ πρότερον τε καθ’ ὃν καιρὸν βασιλεὺς Σέλευκος
Explicit: f. 50r l. 6 Διονύσιος Διονυτᾶ, Παρμενίσκος Πυθέου

CIG 3137, ll. 1-33; Hicks 176.I; Syll41 171, ll. 1-33; Michel 19, ll. 1-33; OGIS 229.I; Schmitt, Staatsverträge III 492.I (PH); IMag. Sip. 1.I (PH); *ISmyrna 573.I + II 2 p. 376

4.2. ff. 50r-50v
Treaty of sympoliteia between Smyrna and Magnesia (Sip.), with oaths; 245/243? BC; probably from Smyrna
Incipit: f. 50r l. 7 Ἐπὶ ἱερέως Ἡγησίου, στεφανηφόρου δὲ Πυθοδώρου μηνὸς Ληναιῶνος ἀγαθῇ τύχῃ
Explicit: f. 50v l. 30 ταῦτα δὲ ἀμφοτέροις τοῖς πλήθεσιν συντετελέσθαι τύχῃ ἀγαθῇ

CIG 3137, ll. 34-88; Hicks 176.II; Syll41 171, ll. 34-88; Michel 19, ll. 34-88; OGIS 229.II; Schmitt, Staatsverträge III 492.II; IMag. Sip. 1.II (PH); *ISmyrna 573.II + II 2 p. 376

4.3. ff. 50v-51r
Decree of demos (of Smyrna) including Palaimagnesia in sympoliteia between (Smyrna) and Magnesia (Sip.); 245/243? BC; probably from Smyrna
Incipit: f. 50v l. 31 Ἔδοξεν τῷ δήμῳ στρατηγῶν γνώμῃ ἐπειδὴ προνοῶν ὁ δῆμος ὑπὲρ ἁπάντων τῶν τοῦ βασιλέως Σελεύκου συμφερόντων
Explicit: f. 51r ἀναγέγραφθαι δὲ αὐτὸ καὶ ἐν τοῖς δημοσίοις

CIG 3137, ll. 89-108; Hicks 176.III; Syll41 171, ll. 89-108; Michel 19.III; OGIS 229.III; Schmitt, Staatsverträge III 492.III; IMag. Sip. 1.III (PH); *ISmyrna 573.III + II 2 p. 376

5. ff. 57r-63v
Τranscriptions, critical notes and variants to works by Isocrates, Aristotle ad Euripides

The collection comprises

  • hypotheseis of Isocrates' Against the Sophists, Plataicus and Areopagiticus
  • critical notes and variants on Isocrates' To Philip, Archidamus, Busiris, Plataicus, Areopagiticus, Panathenaicus, To Philip, Archidamus, The team of horses
  • critical notes and variants to Aristotle' s Politics, and On plants
  • critical notes and variants to Euripides' Hecuba, Orestes, Phoenician Women, Hippolytus, Medea, Alcestis, Andromache, Suppliant Women, Iphigenia at Aulis, Iphigenia among the Taurians, Rhesus, Trojan Women, Bacchae, Children of Heracles, Helen, Ion

ff. 64v-65r are blank

6. ff. 66r-68r
⟨ Photius I, Patriarch of Constantinople⟩ , Extract from the Bibliotheca
Rubric: f. 66r Κατὰ τὴν ἐπιτομήν τινα ἐκ τῶν Διονυσίου τοῦ ἀττικίστου
Incipit: || f. 66r Ὅτι Διονύσιός φησι μὴ λέγειν τοὺς Ἀττικιστὰς ὠνησάμην
Explicit: f. 68r αἰτίαν δὲ πρότερον ἔχοντα φόνου||
Final rubric: f. 68r Τέλος

The text, presented in the manuscript as a summary from Aelius Dionysius (active 2nd century) , is an extract from cod. 279 of the Bibliotheca by patriarch Photius: R. Henry, Photius. Bibliothèque, Paris , pp. 170 l. 29-185 l. 30 (529b l. 29-535a l. 30); cod. 279 is dedicated to Helladius, hence a note by a later hand in the left margin, upper part, of f. 66r, ‘ Helladius v. Photium’

Filiation: These leaves were copied from MS Trinity O.1.5 ( Diller 1965 p. 395; see also Isepy 2020, p. 208 and note 98)

TLG 4040.001

ff. 41r-41v are blank

7. ff. 69r-70r
Glossae in Herodotum
Rubric: f. 69r Λεξικὸν τῶν Ἡροδοτείων λέξεων ἐκ μέρους κατὰ στοιχεῖον
Incipit: f. 69r Ἀνέλῃ χρήσῃ, Ἀναξυρίδας. τὰ βαθέα καὶ βασιλικὰ τῶν ὑποδημάτων
Explicit: f. 70r Ψῆνες· κωνώπια τὰ ἐν τοῖς ὀλύνθοις τοῖς ἄρσεσι
Final rubric: f. 70r Τέλος τοῦ λεξικοῦ τῶν Ἡροδοτείων λέξεων

TLG 4304.002

Ff. 41r-41v are blank

8. f. 72r
Notes on Timaeus of Locri
Rubric: f. 72r Τιμαίῳ τῷ Λόκρῳ[sic]
Incipit: f. 72r σ. 43 χο. 9 φύσιν, οἷον τὸ πῦρ κατὰ τὴν ἑαυτοῦ θερμότητα
Explicit: f. 72r χο. 29 δευτέρᾳ περιόδῳ ἤτοι ἐμ δευτέρῳ βίῳ

The text consists of brief citations from the text (ed. W. Marg, The Pythagorean texts of the Hellenistic period (ed. H. Thesleff), Abo 1965, pp. 203, 205-225, TLG 1734.001; the attribution to Timaeus of Locri , is considered spurious), underlined, and brief explanatory comments; references are made to locations in the text (a printed edition?)

9. ff. 72v-73v
Notes on Plato's spurious works
Rubric: f. 72v Πλάτωνος νοθευόμενοι
Incipit: f. 72v Περὶ δικαίου. Τά πολλὰ ψεύδονται ἀοιδοί
Explicit: f. 73v τούτους δὴ τοὺς εἰς τὰ γένη τεταγμένους, γενήτας καλοῦσιν
Final rubric: f. 73v Τέλος
10. ff. 73v-74r
Fragmenta et titulus
Incipit: || f. 73v Ἐπίτριτος τοῦ πράτου ὁ φιβ· ὑπερέχει γὰρ αὐτοῦ τοῖς ρκη
Explicit: f. 74r ψυχὰν ταύτᾳ ὡς[sic] διεῖκει[sic]

This is a fragment from a spurious work attributed to Timaeus of Locri

The text starts in the manuscript at W. Marg, The Pythagorean texts of the Hellenistic period, ed. H. Thesleff, Abo 1965, p. 211 l. 22

TLG 1734.001

11. ff. 74v-75v
Four inscriptions

f. 76r is blank

11.1. f. 74v
Transcription of an inscription once in St James's Park, Westminster
Incipit: f. 74v Ἡρώδης[sic] μνημεῖον καὶ τοῦτο εἶναι τῆς αὐτοῦ συμφορᾶς
Explicit: f. 74v εἰς τὴν βουλὴν συγκλήτου δόγματι

A note in black ink specifies the provenance of the inscription, ‘ In hortis Divi Jacobi prope Westmonasterium’

Regilla Herodis Attici uxor post a. 161, see G. Dittenberger, Sylloge Inscriptionum Graecarum, 2, Leipzig 19173 , 858; the inscription was on a stone originally found in Rome, and afterwards transferred to Britain, but now destroyed

Dittenberger 19173, 858; Prideaux Marm. Oxon. append. 302, 28; CIG 6185; Kaibel IG XIV 1392

11.2. f. 74v
Epitaph of Peter Young
Rubric: f. 74v Petrus Young
Incipit: f. 74v A Seton eq. aur. ser.mo ac pot.mo
Explicit: f. 74v Obiit Ian. vii an. mdcxxviii aet. sae. lxxxiiii

The epitaph is dated in 1628

11.3. f. 75r
Transcription of a Latin inscription
Incipit: f. 75r In his aedificis et locis puris adiacentibus
Explicit: f. 75r quam sententiam sanctam esse omnes sciunto idque totum testatur marmor.

A note in black ink specifies ‘ Exstat inter inscriptiones Lipsii fol. 14 pag. b’: the inscription has been published in M. Smet, Inscriptionum antiquarum quae passim per Europam, liber. Accessit Auctarium a Iusto Lipsio, Lugduni Batavorum 1588, fol. xiiii, no. 2; the inscription is located, in the edition, in Naples, ‘ in domo Hadriani Gulielmi’

11.4. f. 75v
Transcription of a Latin inscription
Incipit: f. 75v Ab colonia deducta anno xc N Fufiolo[sic] N.F.M. Deullio[sic] duo vir
Explicit: f. 75v C.F. Ti Cassicius[sic]

A note in black ink specifies ‘ Exstat in Inscriptionibus antiquis Lipsii fol. 14’: the inscription has been published in M. Smet, Inscriptionum antiquarum quae passim per Europam, liber. Accessit Auctarium a Iusto Lipsio, Lugduni Batavorum 1588, fol. xiiii, no. 1; the inscription is located, in the edition, in Naples, ‘ in domo Hadriani Gulielmi’

The same hand which wrote the reference to Lipsius' work corrected in the right margin the faulty transcription of the names in ll. 2-3, ‘ Fufidio’ and ‘ Pullio’

11.5. f. 75v
Transcription of a Latin funerary inscription
Incipit: f. 75v Ossua Loadiceae Philadis hic sita sunt memoriae facti et infamiae
Explicit: f. 75v tacito nomine extra sortem ad R. P.

See, slightly different, CIL, vol. vi, 5, *43

The inscription has been written directly after the preceding text; a horizontal line has been traced in order to separate them

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: ff. 1-76 Thick western paper, folded in folio. No watermarks are visible. ff. [i]-[ii], [iii]-[v] Western paper, folded in folio. No watermarks are visible.
Extent: Codex: ii + 76 + iii leaves. 360-365 × 220-230 mm.
Foliation:

Modern foliation in pencil, in Arabic numerals, in the upper margin right from 1 to 76; there are 2 unnumbered modern endleaves at the beginning and 3 at the end of the manuscript: [i]-[ii] + 1-76 + [iii]-[v].

Collation

The leaves have been sewn very tightly, there is no numbering of the quires, and there are no watermarks. It was not possible to determine the collation.

Condition

The leaves have not been trimmed, therefore the edges are very worn and damaged, particularly at the beginning and at the end of the manuscript, where portions of the margins have been lost and repaired with Japanese paper. There are humidity and water stains throughout, as well as dirt stains.

Layout

No regular layout throughout. On ff. 49v-51r the text has been written transversally.

Hand(s)

ff. 2r-4r, 71r, 72r Hand A: a minuscule script slightly slanting to the right, characterized by a generally round form of uprights, which generally end with ornamental tails and flourishings.

The text is written in black ink

ff. 4v-40v, 42r-43v, 66r-68r, 69r-70r Hand B: the texts have been written by Henri II Estienne (1531-1598) , in an informal minuscule, vertical (RGK II, 148, where ff. 4v-44v and 66r-68v are attributed to him; however, in my opinion, ff. 44r-44v are to be attributed to Patrick Young, see hand C, and ff. 66r-68v probably to Henry Scrimgeour, see hand D).

Titles and final rubrics throughout are written in a more "baroque" variant of the script, with a lot of ornamental flourishings (see e.g. f. 8v, ff. 12v-13r).

The text is written in a brown ink.

Estienne wrote also parts in Latin.

ff. 44r-44v, 49v-51r, 74v-75v, 76v, marginal notes on ff. 49v-51r, 70v, 72v-75r, 76v: hand C, Patrick Young (1584-1652) , in a minuscule script, slightly slanting to the right, flowing, regular in size, characterised by contrast between thin and thick strokes and small flourishing tails at the end of some vertical and oblique strokes (see e.g. rho, csi, beta, zeta, eta). For the identification see M. R. James, The Western Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College Cambridge, vol. 3, Cambridge 1902, p. 325, where the manuscript is said to have been written ‘ largely by Patrick Young’; more precisely the hand of Young has been identified by P. Isepy 2020, p. 208 note 99, on ff. 49v-51r, 57r-63v, 70v, 72v-75r, 76v, marginal notes on ff. 2r, 66r-68r, 69r. The script on ff. 57r-63v and 72v-74r, however, in my opinion, is not that of Patrick Young: althought the script is contemporary and very similar, it is more rigid, upright, some characteristic features of Young's hand are missing, such as the characteristic beta, slanting to the right, and with an ornamental hook at the end of the upright, rho with the upright slanting to the left and ending with an ornamental hook, csi with a loop in the upper part, slanting to the left, and there are forms which are not present in Young's script, like the high tau in form of a 'flag', zeta in the form of a '2', without ornamental loops. For other examples of te script of Patrick Young, see, for example, London, British Library, Harley 7522 B ).

The text is written in a light brown ink.

ff. 57r-63v, 72v-74r Hand D: a minuscule script similar to Patrick Young's, probably also by a western European hand, upright, rigid.

ff. 66r-68r The text in these leaves has been copied by hand E, Henry Scrimgeour (1505-1572) (see James, p. 325; Isepy 2020, p. 208). On f. 66r, in the right margin, there is a note written by Patrick Young about the text on ff. 66r-68r, who defines the text ‘ inscriptio magni avunculi manu scripta’: Scrimger was his great-uncle (under the note another hand specified ‘ Magnus avunculus... Scrimgerus Scott.’. In RGK II, 148 the copying of these leaves has been assigned to Henri II Estienne; although the script is similar to his hand, some characteristic features are different.

Decoration

On ff. 4v-43v, where the text has been written by Henri II Estienne (hand B), there are small decorative elements near titles, very roughly traced, see e.g. ff. 16r, 19r, 42r) in red ink.

Additions

On the left pastedown are written, in brown ink, the present shelfmark, ‘ O.5.23’, and an older shelfmark relating to the Gale collection, ‘ A. 20’.

On f. 1r there is a title in black ink, ‘ Thomas Reinusius in variis Lect. multa emendat. p. 425. 446 | Collectanea Varia’.

On f. 1v there are notes in Greek and Latin by hand A, written probably at different times (they have been written in three different inks)

On f. 76v there are notes by Patrick Young:

  • A list of works in Greek
  • An extract from the catalogue of the library of S. Antonio di Castello in Venice: ‘Ex catalogo Bibliothecae Sancti Antonii ’; at the end, by another hand, ‘ In catalogo Bibliothecae S. Antonii, Venetiis, nulli ex his libris apparent. Quare Basilii Magni Grammatica exercitamenta Gesne….’
In the upper, left, part of the leaf a note in a very faint ink is visible.

Binding

Modern binding: paper cover over couched-laminate boards; parchment on spine, where are pasted three paper labels with the shelfmark ‘ O’ ‘ 5’ ‘ 23’. 365 × 235 × ca. 23 mm.

History

Origin:

The manuscript is probably a composite, formed by various parts, which were originally independent, and were copied at different times. The leaves containing texts copied by Henry II Estienne (1531-1598) and Henry Scrimegeour (1505?-1572) were copied in the 16th century; since some of the texts written by Estienne were copied from a manuscript of the convent of S Marco in Florence, and since the French scholar travelled to Italy (and was in Florence) in the years 1552-1555, the his portion of the manuscript could be dated around this time. The leaves transcribed by Patrick Young (1584-1652) were copied later, probably in the first half of the 17th century.

Provenance and Acquisition

The manuscipt was owned by Thomas Gale (1635/1636-1702) , Regius professor of Greek at the University of Cambridge, High Master of St Paul's School and Dean of York. It appears among Thomas Gale's Greek manuscripts in E. Bernard, Catalogi librorum manuscriptorum Angliæ et Hiberniæ, Oxoniæ 1697, p. 189, where it appears as 9 items: no. 5975 (141) ‘ Collectanea varia in Lucianum’, no. 5976 (142) ‘ Astrampsychus de Somniis’, no. 5977 (143) ‘ Variae Lectiones in Lucianum’, no. 5978 (144) ‘ Decretum Marmoreum de Seleuco. Excerpta e Dionysio Atticista’, no. 5979 (145) ‘ Lexicon Herodoti’, no. 5980 (146) ‘ Argumenta orationum Isocratis’, no. 5981 (147) ‘ Variae Lectiones ad Aristotelis Politica’, no. 5982 (148) ‘ Aristotelis libri de Plantis’, no. 5983 (149) ‘ Quaedam Notae in Euripidem, in folio’.

It was donated to Trinity College by Roger Gale (1672-1744) in 1738. On f. 1v is pasted the Trinity College bookplate. On ff. 1v, 68v, 69r, 70v, 76v there are stamps of Trinity College.

Additional Information

Record Sources

Description (2020) draws partly on M. R. James, The Western Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College Cambridge, vol. 3, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1902, p. 325.

Availability

Visitors to Trinity College who wish to consult Special Collections material are required to apply to the Library in advance of their visit. For information on eligibility and admission procedures see: Trinity College: Information for Readers.

Bibliography

    The western manuscripts in the library of Trinity College: a descriptive catalogue, James, M. R. (Cambridge, 3, Cambridge University Press, 1902) The tradition of the minor Greek geographers Philological monographs, Diller, Aubrey (Lancaster, PA, American Philological Association,, 1952) Photius' "Bibliotheca" in Byzantine Literature Dumbarton Oaks Papers, Diller, Aubrey (16, 389-396, 1962) Repertorium der griechischen Kopisten, 800-1600 Veröffentlichungen der Kommission für Byzantinistik, Gamillscheg, ErnstHarlfinger, Dieter, (Wien, II. Frankreich, Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, 1989) El copista griego Jacobo Diasorino (s. XVI): estudio paleográfico y codicológico de sus manuscritos, García Bueno, Carmen (2017, http://hdl.handle.net/10803/456128) Towards a new text of Helladius. Neglected Manuscript Evidence on Photius’ Bibliotheke Rheinisches Museum für Philologie, Isépy, Peter (163, 2, 189-230, 2020)

Funding of Cataloguing

The Polonsky Foundation

Digital Images

Cambridge Digital Library