Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2
Medical treatises and recipes
Contents
Physical Description
15th-, 17th-, and 20th-century foliation together constituting one continuous sequence:
[a]-[c] + i | 1-3 | 4-24, 26-32, 34, 36-80, 83-90 + [d]
Numbering in dark ink in the upper right-hand corners of the rectos of 1-19 (17th-century foliation); preceded and continued by numbering (i + 20-24) in pencil in the same location (20th-century folation): continued by numbering (26-31) in lighter ink in the same location that is contemporary with the manuscript's production (15th-century foliation); continued by 20th-century foliation (32, 34); 15th-century foliation (36-70); 17th-century foliation (71); 15th-century foliation (72-80, 83-90). This foliation sequence is followed in this catalogue record.15th-century foliation in Part 3:
1-12, 15-23, 26-31, 34-80, 83-90
Numbering in light brown ink in the upper right-hand corners of the rectos. This foliation has been partly crossed out by a 20th-century foliator. In this catalogue record, it is only followed were it has been accepted and integrated into the modern foliation sequence added by the 20th-century foliator.Collation
- One fragmentary leaf
- Quire 14-1 (ff. 1-3: 1st leaf missing) |
- Quire 210 (ff. 4-13)
- Quire 310-2+2 (ff. 14-23: 3rd-4th leaves missing and 1 bifolium inserted after the 5th leaf)
- Quire 48 (ff. 24-32)
- Quire 512 (ff. 34-46)
- Quire 614 (ff. 47-60)
- Quire 78 (ff. 61-68)
- Quire 812 (ff. 69-80)
- Quire 98 (ff. 83-90)
One fragmentary leaf | 14-1 (1st missing) | 210 310-2+2 (3rd-4th missing and 1 bifolium inserted after 5th) 48 512 614 78 812 98
Binding
? 17th-, 18th-, or 19th-century binding: half white vellum binding with ligh brown paper sides over pasteboards; the spine with three paper labels ontwo which have been printed the separate alpha-numerical elements of the manuscripts classmark: ‘O’, ‘8’, ‘2’.
Binding height: 230mm; width: 150mm; depth: 25mm.
History
Provenance and Acquisition
Richard Tenet (fl. 1418-after 1422) , Carmelite friar: the manuscript was copied in large part by Tenet, with many annotations throughout also added by him, suggesting that he made the book for his own use. It is likely that he also added the fragmentary leaves at the beginning of the manuscript, since the mark in the top left-hand corner of f. 3v (which M.R. James took as a possible classmark, reading it as ‘TT’) is in fact Tenet's own initials ‘TR’, which are also seen in a colophon written in a textura display script on f. 15v. As Jones (2024) notes, Tenet also copied part of a copy of John Baconthorpe (c. 1290-1346)'s commentary on the of Peter Lombard's Sententiarum libri IV in London, British Library, Royal MS 11 C.vi . Although the commentary on the Sententiarum libri IV on ff. 1r-3v does not appear to be Baconthorpe's, the fragmentary leaves may still testify to Tenet's interest in Lombard's work. On Tenet, see R. Copsey, Biographical Register of Carmelites in England and Wales, 1240-1540 (Faversham: St Albert's Press, 2020), p. 323.
One of the manuscripts of Thomas Gale (1635/6-1702) , dean of York, antiquary and fellow of Trinity College Cambridge.
One of the manuscripts of Roger Gale (1672-1744) , antiquary and scholar, son of Thomas Gale. Inherited from his father.
Donated to Trinity College by Roger Gale (1672-1744) , son of Thomas Gale (1635/6-1702), in 1738. The alpha-numerical elements of its current classmark are printed on three labels pasted onto the spine (‘O’, ‘8’, ‘2’), and inscribed in brown ink on the inside of the front cover. The manuscript's previous classmarks ‘169’ and ‘C. 38’ are inscribed in brown ink on f. 1r. The college's printed ex libris featuring its armorial coat of arms and name (‘Collegium SS. et Individuae Trinitatis in Academia Cantabrigiensi’) is pasted on f. 1r.
Part 1 [Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2, f. i]
Contents
Language(s): Latin
The text on f. i recto is much faded an only partly legible.
The text on f. i recto is much faded an only partly legible.
Physical Description
Condition
A fragmentary leaf taken from a liturgical manuscript. It has been roughly (and unevenly) cut to match the size of this (or another) manuscript. A large cut in the upper part of the leaf has been repaired with green sewing thread.
Layout
190 × 105 mm. No ruling visible. single columns. 14 lines of text, each accompanied by a 4-line stave.
Hand(s)
Copied by a single hand in a neat textualis script.
Decoration
Large plain initials in blue or red at the beginning of new lines.
Titles of sequences written in red ink.
Music staves (4) drawn in red ink with neumes in dark ink.
History
Part 2 [Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2, ff. 1-3]
Contents
Language(s): Latin
While the text of this section of the Sententiarum Libri IV ends on f. 2v, the 'marginal' gloss continues as regular text on ff. 3r-3v. The gloss has not been identified.
Written upside-down on the page.
Added to the upper and outer margins of f. 3v by a later (?) 14th-century hand.
Added by a (?) 15th-century hand.
Physical Description
Collation
- Quire 14-1 (ff. 1-3: 1st leaf missing)
Layout
160-165 × 100-105 mm. Ruled in leadpoint, frame- and line-ruling. Three columns on ff. 1r-2v (upper half) and one colum on ff. 2v (lower half)-3v. c. 45-50 lines to the page, written below top line.
Hand(s)
The main body of Peter Lombard's Sententiarum Libri IV is copied by a single 14th-century hand in a neat textualis script.
The 'marginal' gloss to Peter Lombard's Sententiarum Libri IV is copied by a single 14th-century hand in a cursive anglicana script.
The text on the sacraments added to the margin of f. 3v is copied by a single late 13th- or early 14th-century hand in a cursive anglicana script.
Decoration
This part of the manuscript does not contain any significant forms of decoration.
Additions
History
Part 3 [Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2, ff. 4-90]
Contents
Language(s): Latin, Middle English, Middle French
Added to the upper margin by a (?) 16th-century hand.
The treatise discusses Scientia practica and Scientia speculativa.
A later (?) 17th-century hand has added the title: ‘philosophia’ to the upper margin of f. 4r.
Another (?) 15th-century hand has added the word ‘Amen’ to the rubric.
Full transcription.
A (?) 16th-century hand has added titles for recipes in the margins of ff. 14v-15v.
Both this text and the next item have been tentatively identified as copies of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni. Comparison of this text with the edition of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni by Salvatore de Renzi, Collectio salernitana: ossia documenti inedit e trattati di medicina appartenenti scuola medica salernitana, V, pp. 269-328 leaves great doubt about whether this is a copy of that work.
The final rubric appears to be a later addition. Both this text and the previous item have been tentatively identified as copies of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni. Comparison of this text with the edition of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni by Salvatore de Renzi, Collectio salernitana: ossia documenti inedit e trattati di medicina appartenenti scuola medica salernitana, V, pp. 269-328 leaves great doubt about whether this is a copy of that work.
The treatise discusses different types of urine and ends with a section on women's urine (‘De vrinis mulieris’).
Added by a 15th-century hand.
The verses contain five sections with the headings: ‘dia Cameron’, ‘dia penidion’ ,‘dia benedicta’, ‘dia Cimini’, ‘dia galanga in plate’. The verses largely match with those of the following sections of the Regimen sanitas salernitanum: ‘De diacameron’, ‘De diapenideon’, ‘De benedicta’, ‘De diacimino’, and ‘De athanasia’ (for comparision, see Virginia De Frutos González, 'Critical edition of the medieval medical latin poem Regimen sanitatis salernitanum (manuscripts Add. 12190 and Sloane 351, British Library, London)', Minerva, 23 (2010), pp. 143-195 pp. 174-175).
Full transcription; the first line(s) are missing due to cropping of the page. The verses largely match with the following sections of the Regimen sanitas salernitanum: ‘De medicinis valentibus principalibus membris’, and ‘Contra obscuritatem oculorum’ (for comparison, see Virginia De Frutos González, 'Critical edition of the medieval medical latin poem Regimen sanitatis salernitanum (manuscripts Add. 12190 and Sloane 351, British Library, London)', Minerva, 23 (2010), p. 186).
The treatise is accompanied by a drawing of a urine flask (jordan) in brown ink in which the four regions of urine are indicated (see f. 36r (outer margin)).
Added by a 15th-century hand; the same exhortation can be found in the upper margin of f. 62r; the words ‘ihesu mercy’ can also be found in the upper margins of ff. 50v, 51v; ‘ihesu maria’ in the upper margin of f. 53r
The recipes have been added by two or three 15th-century hands. The second one ‘ffor the parallasy’ is attributed to Gilbert Kymer (d. 1463), physician in the household of Humphrey of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Gloucester: ‘medicina domini Gilberti Kymer quam dedit illustri principi duci gloucester’.
The treatise features sections beginning: ‘Iste est modus iudicandi vrinas’ and ‘In vrina mulierum spermaticum contentum admixtum rubedini’.
The treatise is followed by uroscopic diagrams on ‘Circulus’ and ‘Spuma’.
The work is accompanied by a circular diagram in brown ink (see f. 72v (lower half)).
A 17th-century hand has added the title ‘Gerard Cremon’ to the upper margin of the page.
The diagram consists of six concentric circles that have been divided into 12 sections. At the centre of the diagram are the words: ‘mundus / tempus / homo / Elementum’.
The final rubric attributes the treatise to Richardus Anglicus (fl. c. 1180). The latter was considered to be the most learned and experienced physician in England by Gilbertus Anglicus (d. c. 1250), who must be the 'Magister Gilbert' to whom the rubric refers. This probably is a copy of the Signa by Richardus Anglicus (for this work, see H. H. Beusing, 'Leben und Werke des Richardus Anglicus, samt einem erstmaligen Abdruck seiner Schrift Signa' (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universität Leipzig, ?1922).
Below the treatise is a note about the differences between the urine of humans and animals; and a verse from the Regiminen sanitatis Salernitatum: ‘De prope spissa magis hominis minctura uidetur / Non liquor est alius cui talis regula detur’.
A 15th-century hand has added the title: ‘ Contra distemperanciam omnium membrorum in primo ?compendio’ to the upper margin of f. 77r.
The first section after the introduction begins: ‘Hee sunt herbe contra discrasiam capitis’. Other copies of this treatise seem to occur in Continental manuscripts: Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS Lat. 6891 , ff. 80v-82r (‘Tractatus medicinarum omnium membrorum distemperatorum’); Vatican City, Vatican Library, Pal. Lat. MS 1183 , ff. g recto-k recto (untitled, begins: ‘Herbe contra discrasiam frigidam capitis’) [partly corresponds with the treatise in Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2]; and Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Cod. 2531 , ff. 77r-79r (‘Tractatus brevis et utiliis medicinarum omnium membrorum, tam in calliditate, quam in frigiditate’).
The collection begins imperfectly due to the loss of preceding folios. Aside from medical recipes, it also contains a section of chemical recipes for making pigments on ff. 86v-87r: scarlet (‘Si vis facere vermiculum’), white lead (‘Si vis facere cerusam plumbi’), and red lead (‘Si uis facere plumbum rubeum’). F. 87r contains a Middle English recipe for making gingerbread: ‘ffor to make gingerbred’; a method for writing on iron: ‘Scribere in ferro’; and an explanation of apothecary weights and symbols, beginning: ‘Nota quod libra medicinalis diuiditur in .12. uncias’.
A number of recipes are attributed to medical practitioners: One recipe on f. 88r is attributed to a Peter, chancellor of Montpellier (‘Item secundum magistrum petrum cancellarium in monte pess[ulane]’). One recipe is said to be taken from the "Book [of] Wynteby" (‘In libro Wynteby’) on f. 89r. One recipe is attributed to Platearius on f. 89r. Two recipes on f. 89v are said to have been proved by (‘probatur secundum eundem William barbitousorem parisiensis’).
Richard Tenet has added various recipes to the margins of the collection. One recipe in the outer margin of f. 83v is said to have been proved by ‘Platearius’. Among the added recipes are a few charms. One is a charm against poison in humans or animals on f. 83r (lower margin)): ‘Experimentum probatum contra omnem venenum . Scribe hec tria nomina in pane cum stilo . max . nax . pax. et da .3. diebus. primo die primum . postea aliud . 3o 3m. Si sit homo da in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti amen . Si sit aliquod animal . da in nomine salvatoris sui’ [see Jones (2024), p. 68, fn. 103 for an English translation and transcription]. Another on f. 83v (upper margin) gives a method of gaining protection against toothache (an example of folk magic / ritual medicine) associated with a certain John Lynnyngton, who learned it from an old woman: ‘Who so parith þe naylis of all his toys . and all his feyngrys sayungge at euery nayle paryn[g] a pater noster and an aue and att euery fyfte pater . aue. and credo and close þe parynges in a fyre lynne cloth and make an hole in an elder tre and put all hem to þer inne he schall neuer haue þe toþe ache after . John Lynnyngton of an olde woman leryd þis medicyn for trewthe’ (full transcription). This may be the John Lynnyngton/Lymyngton/Lymyton recorded as a Carmelite friar (fl. 1432-1452), who may have known Tenet at Oxford (see Richard Copsey, Biographical Register of Carmelites in England and Wales, 1240-1540 (Faversham: Saint Albert's Press, 2020)).
A third charm to staunch blood is on f. 86r: ‘Ad stringendum sanguinem in omni parte corporis mira medicina millees [sic: probably ‘millefoiles’ since milfoil or yarrow has long been used to stop nosebleeds] et experta a quod cirurgico in vasconia: Accede ad locum vbi crescit sanguis et flexis genibus dic pater noster et aue . et hic uersus . Te ergo quaesumus tuis fa[mulis] subueni quos precioso sanguine redemisti . tunc accipitur herba et ponitur in panno lineo ut fine panno fricetur ne patiens sciat qualis herba sit . et apponatur loco cruentanti . et si plures colliges pro qualibet et pater et aue et uer[sus] dicas’. Among the additions, as Jones (2024) points out is also a magical method for finding the body of a drowned person by anointing a stick with the blood of their nearest relative and using it as a divining rod (see f. 85r).
Remedy for infertility on f. 87v (full transcription):| Medicina uera et sepius approbata, ut mulier concipiat quamcumque sterilis fuerit. Recipe testiculos trium uel quartum mustelarum et semiplenum manum de mowsere iuniore et combure in olla rudi omnia pariter. Postea pulueriza et pasta cum succo herbe predicte, et fac inde pillas mollis ad modum nuclei auellane, et, per locum secretum tam profunde imponatur quae matricem attingat, et iaceat ibi per tres dies, in quibus omnio abstineat a coitu, post hos autem cum viro coiat et sine mora concipiat. |Full translation:| A true medicine, and often proven, so that a woman may conceive however sterile she may be. Take three or four weasel testicles and half a handful of young mouse-ear [a plant] and burn it all equally in an earthenware pot. Afterwards, grind and combine with the juice of the aforementioned herb, and thus make soft pills in the manner of a hazelnut kernel, and place them so deeply in the private parts that they touch the uterus, and leave there for three days, during which she should abstain entirely from sex. After these three days, however, she should have intercourse with a man and she should conceive without delay.
Physical Description
Collation
- Quire 210 (ff. 4-13)
- Quire 310-2+2 (ff. 14-23: 3rd-4th leaves missing and 1 bifolium inserted after the 5th leaf)
- Quire 48 (ff. 24-32)
- Quire 512 (ff. 34-46)
- Quire 614 (ff. 47-60)
- Quire 78 (ff. 61-68)
- Quire 812 (ff. 69-80)
- Quire 98 (ff. 83-90)
The upper margins of three leaves feature marks but their significance is not apparent: f. 15v: ‘Q’; f. 16r: ‘R’; and f. 19v: ‘S’.
Catchwords in decorative banderols of red ink in the lower margins of Quires 5 and 6 (see ff. 46v and 60v).Layout
170-195 × 110-115 mm. No ruling visible except for ff. 4v-94 where both frames and lines are ruled in ink. Single columns except for ff. 6r-10v which feature 2 columns. 50-64 lines to the page.
Hand(s)
Folios 4r-90v were copied, and subsequently annotated, by the Carmelite friar Richard Tenet (fl. 1418-after 1422) (see his colophons on ff. 5v, 10v, 13r, 27v, 68r, 72v, 76v, 77v, 80r, 90v, in a cursive script with both anglicana and secretary features.
Decoration
A scientific circular diagram in brown ink on f. 72v, showing the correspondence between the elements, humours, times of the year, and parts of the world.
A drawing of a urine flask (jordan) in brown ink integrated into the text on f. 36r.
Decorative banderols in brown ink with sub-headings to texts added to the margins, e.g. see ff. 73r-76v.
Large (1-4 lines) initials outlined or coloured in brown ink, sometimes featuring minor forms of decoration (e.g. the initial ‘J’ features a fish on f. 78r; and the initial ‘U’ features floral motifs inside the letter on f. 80r).
One large (1-3 lines) initial outlined or coloured in red ink on ff. 52r and 73r.
Headings and explicits written in red ink in the margins (perhaps indicating that these were added after the manuscript's main contents were written).
Small (1 line) initials in dark ink occasionally higlighted with red ink.
Paraphs in red ink.
Underlining in red ink.
Additions
The outer margins of ff i recto and 1r contain an index to the manuscript in a 17th-century hand.
Folio 13v features a partial index to remedies. As Jones (2024) notes, the index was copied by the 15th-century foliator.
History
Provenance
Richard Tenet (fl. 1418-after 1422) , Carmelite friar: the manuscript was copied in large part and annotated by Tenet (see Script, above, and Provenance in the parent section of the description).
Additional Information
Record Sources
Availability
Visitors to Trinity College who wish to consult Special Collections material are required to apply to the Library in advance of their visit. For information on eligibility and admission procedures see: Trinity College: Information for Readers.
Custodial History
Bibliography
-
The Western Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge: A Descriptive
Catalogue, James, M.R. (Cambridge, 3, Cambridge University Press, 1902)
Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge Index of Middle English prose, Mooney, Linne R. (Woodbridge, D.S. Brewer, 1995)
La science des urines de Maurus de Salerne et les Sinthomata Magistri Mauri inédits
La scuola medica salernitana: gli autori e i testi: convegno internazionale Università
degli
Studi di Salerno, 3-5 novembre 2004, Moulinier-Brogi, Laurence (Florence, 261-282, SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2007)
The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England Health and Healing in the Middle Ages, Jones, Peter Murray (Woodbridge, Boydell & Brewer, 2024)
Funding of Cataloguing
Wellcome (cataloguing). All images provided by Trinity College, Cambridge.
Digital Images
Abbreviations
View list of abbreviations and editorial conventions.
