Medieval Manuscripts in Cambridge Libraries

A catalogue of Western manuscripts and papyri at Cambridge University Library, the Fitzwilliam Museum and selected Cambridge colleges

Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2

Medical treatises and recipes

Contents

Introduction: We learn more about the scribe of the principal texts in Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2 than is usual for medical manuscripts. The scribe intervenes at the end of texts to tell us his name, Richard Tenet, and the titles of works he copies. Sometimes Tenet's attribution of authorship to these works is ambiguous (e.g. Bernard de Villanova) but he was clearly well acquainted with Salernitan medical literature of all kinds from antidotaria to uroscopies, much of it anonymous. Tenet was happy to copy parts that interested him of longer works whether in prose or verse. His compilation probably dates to after 1422 and was possibly written in Oxford. We know that Richard Tenet was a Carmelite Friar and it is clear from his annotations to texts in the manuscript that he practised medicine himself. The medical texts in this manuscript written by Tenet fall into five broad groups. First comes a lexicon of names of herbs (or synonyma) in Latin with Middle English equivalents. Second, there are texts on different kinds of medicaments and the illnesses for which they can be used. Third, there are texts on diagnosis from urine (five) and pulse (one). Fourth, there is a remedy book written in Latin, Middle English and Anglo-Norman, lacking its beginning, and possibly not complete. Finally there are two anonymous texts on pestilence, the second of which is unfinished. This collection of texts was assembled and written by Tenet because of their immediate relevance to medical practice. It is Tenet's added notes, often identified as 'experimenta', which speak most clearly to his own medical practice. Sometimes these are in the margin and Tenet would occasionally write vertically instead of horizontally in these blank areas. The first notes (in the text block rather than marginal) occur at the end of a section De urinis mulieris (On women's urines), which appears to belong to a longer treatise on urines. There is a series of notes by Tenet's hand which are comments on how to diagnose from a woman's urine when she is pregnant. These notes seem to be independent of the text itself and take up most of a page. After the last such note come what Tenet calls 'experimentum 1' and 'experimentum 2', and these are different recipes for plasters to be applied to the right side in case of overheating of the liver (f. 32r). Similarly, on f. 71r, where the text deals with the use of clysters or enemas, Tenet adds notes in the bottom margin about when and how to use clysters, but also the use of medicinal bathing. On f. 80v, where the text is an analysis of colours of urines, Tenet adds notes below about identifying the urine of a virgin, of a woman who has sex with men, or of a menstruating woman. He refers to an authority, 'In libro magistri Roberti scribitur quod...' ('In the book of Master Robert it is written that...'), although this is not readily identifiable. There are many more such experimenta in the margins of the remedy book part of Tenet's manuscript from f. 83r onwards. They include remedies for bruising (citing the Practica of Iohannes Platearius), aids to sleep, ways to lose weight, and notes on identifying kinds of dropsy. There is an 'experimentum probatum' (proven experiment) against poison of all kinds which says, 'Write these three words on pieces of bread with a pen: "max . nax . pax", and give the patient one piece to eat on the first day, two on the second, three on the third, saying "in the name of the father, of the son, and of the holy ghost" if you give it to a human, "in the name of the saviour" if to an animal' (f. 83r, bottom margin). Another experimentum on f. 85r (bottom margin) is a method for finding the body of a drowned person using a red stick anointed with the blood of the nearest relative; the stick is then used as a divining rod over the water. Here Tenet is proposing a kind of natural magic of sympathy, though he does go on to recommend a method of bringing the drowned person back to life by hitting them on the back while they are suspended over the girth of a horse until they spit out water. This will work as long as a day has not passed since the drowned person fell in, we are told. The manuscript is densely written in tightly packed long lines, and the margins often crowded with further additions. In a couple of places, however, the text is provided with illustrative diagrams, again by Tenet's hand. One shows the correspondence between the elements, humours and times of the year and parts of the world (f. 72v), as befits an Oxford-educated student of natural philosophy. The urine flask on f. 36r shows the four regions of a sample to be examined as discussed in the various urine texts. There is a medieval foliation in the manuscript which makes clear that some leaves are missing (ff. 13-14, 24-25, 32-33, 81-82 in this sequence). There is a partial index to remedies, general and pestilential, on f. 13v, written in the foliating hand. The manuscript was no doubt used by subsequent medical practitioners of the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries as a quarry for remedies. On f. 68v are a group of recipes by various fifteenth-century hands. The second one for palsy is attributed to Gilbert Kymer (d. 1463), physician in the household of Humphrey of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Gloucester. Kymer recipes are also to be found in Cambridge, Jesus College, MS Q.G.12 and MS Q.G.25 . Peter Murray Jones| Fellow of King's College, Cambridge

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: Mostly paper leaves, but ff. i, 1-3, 4, 13, 14, 17-18, 23 are parchment leaves.
Extent: Codex: iii + 3 | 82 + 1 leaves. 205-210 × 135-150 mm.
Foliation:

15th-, 17th-, and 20th-century foliation together constituting one continuous sequence:

[a]-[c] + i | 1-3 | 4-24, 26-32, 34, 36-80, 83-90 + [d]

Numbering in dark ink in the upper right-hand corners of the rectos of 1-19 (17th-century foliation); preceded and continued by numbering (i + 20-24) in pencil in the same location (20th-century folation): continued by numbering (26-31) in lighter ink in the same location that is contemporary with the manuscript's production (15th-century foliation); continued by 20th-century foliation (32, 34); 15th-century foliation (36-70); 17th-century foliation (71); 15th-century foliation (72-80, 83-90). This foliation sequence is followed in this catalogue record.
Foliation:

15th-century foliation in Part 3:

1-12, 15-23, 26-31, 34-80, 83-90

Numbering in light brown ink in the upper right-hand corners of the rectos. This foliation has been partly crossed out by a 20th-century foliator. In this catalogue record, it is only followed were it has been accepted and integrated into the modern foliation sequence added by the 20th-century foliator.

Collation

  • One fragmentary leaf
  • Quire 14-1 (ff. 1-3: 1st leaf missing) |
  • Quire 210 (ff. 4-13)
  • Quire 310-2+2 (ff. 14-23: 3rd-4th leaves missing and 1 bifolium inserted after the 5th leaf)
  • Quire 48 (ff. 24-32)
  • Quire 512 (ff. 34-46)
  • Quire 614 (ff. 47-60)
  • Quire 78 (ff. 61-68)
  • Quire 812 (ff. 69-80)
  • Quire 98 (ff. 83-90)

One fragmentary leaf | 14-1 (1st missing) | 210 310-2+2 (3rd-4th missing and 1 bifolium inserted after 5th) 48 512 614 78 812 98

Binding

? 17th-, 18th-, or 19th-century binding: half white vellum binding with ligh brown paper sides over pasteboards; the spine with three paper labels ontwo which have been printed the separate alpha-numerical elements of the manuscripts classmark: ‘O’, ‘8’, ‘2’.

Binding height: 230mm; width: 150mm; depth: 25mm.

History

Provenance and Acquisition

Richard Tenet (fl. 1418-after 1422) , Carmelite friar: the manuscript was copied in large part by Tenet, with many annotations throughout also added by him, suggesting that he made the book for his own use. It is likely that he also added the fragmentary leaves at the beginning of the manuscript, since the mark in the top left-hand corner of f. 3v (which M.R. James took as a possible classmark, reading it as ‘TT’) is in fact Tenet's own initials ‘TR’, which are also seen in a colophon written in a textura display script on f. 15v. As Jones (2024) notes, Tenet also copied part of a copy of John Baconthorpe (c. 1290-1346)'s commentary on the of Peter Lombard's Sententiarum libri IV in London, British Library, Royal MS 11 C.vi . Although the commentary on the Sententiarum libri IV on ff. 1r-3v does not appear to be Baconthorpe's, the fragmentary leaves may still testify to Tenet's interest in Lombard's work. On Tenet, see R. Copsey, Biographical Register of Carmelites in England and Wales, 1240-1540 (Faversham: St Albert's Press, 2020), p. 323.

One of the manuscripts of Thomas Gale (1635/6-1702) , dean of York, antiquary and fellow of Trinity College Cambridge.

One of the manuscripts of Roger Gale (1672-1744) , antiquary and scholar, son of Thomas Gale. Inherited from his father.

Donated to Trinity College by Roger Gale (1672-1744) , son of Thomas Gale (1635/6-1702), in 1738. The alpha-numerical elements of its current classmark are printed on three labels pasted onto the spine (‘O’, ‘8’, ‘2’), and inscribed in brown ink on the inside of the front cover. The manuscript's previous classmarks ‘169’ and ‘C. 38’ are inscribed in brown ink on f. 1r. The college's printed ex libris featuring its armorial coat of arms and name (‘Collegium SS. et Individuae Trinitatis in Academia Cantabrigiensi’) is pasted on f. 1r.

Part 1 [Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2, f. i]

Contents

Language(s): Latin

i recto-i recto
Sequence for Trinity Sunday
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: i recto [...] trinitasi sequencia
Incipit: i recto [V]ox clarescat mens purgetur homo
Explicit: i verso Pater proles et spiramen opem praestant et solamen nobis [...]

The text on f. i recto is much faded an only partly legible.

i recto-i verso
Sequence for the feast of All Saints
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: i recto in die [? omnium sanctorum]
Incipit: i recto Christo inclito candida [...] melodia agmina / Laudes omnibus dantia sanctis per [hec sacra]ta festiala
Explicit: i verso Sacrata d[omino] et castitas nostras serua animas mundaque corpora Mon-||

The text on f. i recto is much faded an only partly legible.

Physical Description

Form: fragment
Support: Parchment
Extent: Codex: 1 leaf. 210 × 140 mm.

Condition

A fragmentary leaf taken from a liturgical manuscript. It has been roughly (and unevenly) cut to match the size of this (or another) manuscript. A large cut in the upper part of the leaf has been repaired with green sewing thread.

Layout

190 × 105 mm. No ruling visible. single columns. 14 lines of text, each accompanied by a 4-line stave.

Hand(s)

Copied by a single hand in a neat textualis script.

Decoration

Large plain initials in blue or red at the beginning of new lines.

Titles of sequences written in red ink.

Music staves (4) drawn in red ink with neumes in dark ink.

History

Origin: Second half of the 14th century. ; England.

Part 2 [Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2, ff. 1-3]

Contents

Language(s): Latin

1. 1r-3v
Fragment of the Sententiarum Libri IV (Book 4, Distinctio I and Distinctio II) with marginal gloss Peter Lombard
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: || 1r -lante gracie tempore consueuit . excepto quod regni celestis ianuam non dum intrare poterant. Cum in sinu abrahe post mortem requie beata consolati . superne pacis ingressum spe felici expectabant
Explicit: 2v Post peccatum uero fuit remedium contra carnalis concupiscencie corruptelam . de quo suo loco tractabimus

While the text of this section of the Sententiarum Libri IV ends on f. 2v, the 'marginal' gloss continues as regular text on ff. 3r-3v. The gloss has not been identified.

2. 1r (lower margin)
Practice alphabet
Language(s): Latin

Written upside-down on the page.

3. 3v (upper and outer margins)
Note on the orgin of the sacraments
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 3v Si sacramenta habeurunt efficiam a Christiane hoc pot[...] fuisset a laterali [crossed out: ‘wlnere’] wlnere sed ab illo wulnus non sacramentum haberit efficiam

Added to the upper and outer margins of f. 3v by a later (?) 14th-century hand.

4. 3v (lower margin)
Title for a medical recipe
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 3v (lower margin) Vnguentum c[?e]dum calefacit diuersas partes

Added by a (?) 15th-century hand.

Physical Description

Secundo Folio: 2r: dimmitebamur
Form: codex
Support: Parchment (FHHF)
Extent: Codex: 3 leaves. 205 × 135 mm.

Collation

  • Quire 14-1 (ff. 1-3: 1st leaf missing)

Layout

160-165 × 100-105 mm. Ruled in leadpoint, frame- and line-ruling. Three columns on ff. 1r-2v (upper half) and one colum on ff. 2v (lower half)-3v. c. 45-50 lines to the page, written below top line.

Hand(s)

The main body of Peter Lombard's Sententiarum Libri IV is copied by a single 14th-century hand in a neat textualis script.

The 'marginal' gloss to Peter Lombard's Sententiarum Libri IV is copied by a single 14th-century hand in a cursive anglicana script.

The text on the sacraments added to the margin of f. 3v is copied by a single late 13th- or early 14th-century hand in a cursive anglicana script.

Decoration

This part of the manuscript does not contain any significant forms of decoration.

Additions

History

Origin: Second half of the 13th century or first half of the 14th century. ; England.

Part 3 [Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2, ff. 4-90]

Contents

Language(s): Latin, Middle English, Middle French

1. 4r
Saying or motto
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 4r Animus in patulis

Added to the upper margin by a (?) 16th-century hand.

2. 4r-5v
Treatise on natural science
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 4r Cum omnem appetitum moueat bonum
Explicit: 5v patet igitur diuisio omnium scienciarum naturalium
Final rubric: 5v Explicit sufficiencia omnium scienciarum naturalium

The treatise discusses Scientia practica and Scientia speculativa.

A later (?) 17th-century hand has added the title: ‘philosophia’ to the upper margin of f. 4r.

eTK 0324H
3. 5v
On natural science
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 5v In omni genere est vnum quod est mediatus
Explicit: 5v sed sufficit quod fuit per reductionem. quod tenet
eTK 0699G
4. 6r-10v
Lexicon of Latin and English names of herbs
Language(s): Latin and Middle English
Incipit: 6r Apium commune . smalache
Explicit: 10v Zemlia id est centmodium
Final rubric: 10v Explicit per fratrem Ricardum Tenet

Another (?) 15th-century hand has added the word ‘Amen’ to the rubric.

eTK 0113N
5. 11r-13r
Verse antidotary
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 11r Renes et reuma caput lapis et latus algida matrix - Aurea
Explicit: 13r eruit erectum carni de uulnere plenum
Final rubric: 13r Explicit tractatus electuarium sirruporum et unguentorum. Scriptus per tenet
eTK 0166G
eTK 1348D
Mooney (1995), p. 161 [other copies]
6. 13r (outer margin)
Note on the origin of the Latin name for the hare
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 13r (outer margin) lepre que nomen si suscipit ex elephante

Full transcription.

7. 14r-15v
Compendium compositionum Bernard de Gordon
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 14r Quoniam de melioribus amicis quas habere uideor
Explicit: 15v cum medicinis infrigidantibus renes et vesicam que dicte sunt
Final rubric: 15v Explicit practica magistrii Bernardi de villa noua cathalani. Scriptus per tr [i.e. Richard Tenet]

A (?) 16th-century hand has added titles for recipes in the margins of ff. 14v-15v.

eTK 1270E
8. 16r-22r
?Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni ?Bernardus Provincialis
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 16r Ad opus omnium in arte medicinali studere uolencium
Explicit: 22r que gerens alienas

Both this text and the next item have been tentatively identified as copies of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni. Comparison of this text with the edition of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni by Salvatore de Renzi, Collectio salernitana: ossia documenti inedit e trattati di medicina appartenenti scuola medica salernitana, V, pp. 269-328 leaves great doubt about whether this is a copy of that work.

eTK 0055N
9. 22r-27v
?Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni ?Bernardus Provincialis
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 22r Omne inquit Tullius in suis rethoricis dictis
Explicit: 27v externis cataplasmatum valet epaticis. Quod Tenet
Final rubric: 27v Explicit commentarium Bernardi prouincialis super tabulas magistri Salarni

The final rubric appears to be a later addition. Both this text and the previous item have been tentatively identified as copies of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni. Comparison of this text with the edition of the Commentarium super Tabulas Salerni by Salvatore de Renzi, Collectio salernitana: ossia documenti inedit e trattati di medicina appartenenti scuola medica salernitana, V, pp. 269-328 leaves great doubt about whether this is a copy of that work.

eTK 0982I
10. 28r-32r
Treatise on uroscopy
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 28r Tractatus de urinis
Incipit: 28r In urina sunt 4 regiones considerande
Explicit: 32r deinde fricentur in patella cum adipe porcio et calide apponitur

The treatise discusses different types of urine and ends with a section on women's urine (‘De vrinis mulieris’).

11. 32r
Verses on five medicines from the Regimen sanitas salernitanum
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 32r dia Cameron - Qui caruere nomen denominata asma dolorem / Artetisa tesim stomachi tussim que relaxat / Errorem renum proscribens debilitatem / lassiuos motus veneris producit in vsus
Explicit: 32r dia galanga in plate - ffluxum constringit ventris . muliebria fiant / Sanguinij sputi causas abstergit, et undas / ffortiter exciccat [sic: exiccat] galange ?lamina nares

Added by a 15th-century hand.

The verses contain five sections with the headings: ‘dia Cameron’, ‘dia penidion’ ,‘dia benedicta’, ‘dia Cimini’, ‘dia galanga in plate’. The verses largely match with those of the following sections of the Regimen sanitas salernitanum: ‘De diacameron’, ‘De diapenideon’, ‘De benedicta’, ‘De diacimino’, and ‘De athanasia’ (for comparision, see Virginia De Frutos González, 'Critical edition of the medieval medical latin poem Regimen sanitatis salernitanum (manuscripts Add. 12190 and Sloane 351, British Library, London)', Minerva, 23 (2010), pp. 143-195 pp. 174-175).

12. 32r (vertical text)
Verses on two medicines from the Regimen sanitas salernitanum
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: || 32r (vertical text) [...] Pulmo licuricia \ aliud e[...]rosa/, mac[is] cor, cerebrum quoque musta
Explicit: 32r (vertical text) Ruta veruena . rosa feniculum . celidona / Ex hijs fit aqua . per quam sunt luminam clara

Full transcription; the first line(s) are missing due to cropping of the page. The verses largely match with the following sections of the Regimen sanitas salernitanum: ‘De medicinis valentibus principalibus membris’, and ‘Contra obscuritatem oculorum’ (for comparison, see Virginia De Frutos González, 'Critical edition of the medieval medical latin poem Regimen sanitatis salernitanum (manuscripts Add. 12190 and Sloane 351, British Library, London)', Minerva, 23 (2010), p. 186).

13. 34r-68r
Treatise on uroscopy
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 34r Incipit tractatus op[timus de urinis]
Incipit: 34r In omnibus libris latinorum nullus inuenitur autenticus
Explicit: 68r tocius corporis in viro et muliere Walt. et Jo. de s.a.
Final rubric: 68r Explicit ?quemadmodum fuerat per tenet

The treatise is accompanied by a drawing of a urine flask (jordan) in brown ink in which the four regions of urine are indicated (see f. 36r (outer margin)).

14. 56v (upper margin
Prayer exhortation
Language(s): Latin and Middle English
Incipit: 56v (upper margin dulcis ihesu mercy

Added by a 15th-century hand; the same exhortation can be found in the upper margin of f. 62r; the words ‘ihesu mercy’ can also be found in the upper margins of ff. 50v, 51v; ‘ihesu maria’ in the upper margin of f. 53r

15. 68v
Eight medical recipes
Language(s): Middle English with some Latin

The recipes have been added by two or three 15th-century hands. The second one ‘ffor the parallasy’ is attributed to Gilbert Kymer (d. 1463), physician in the household of Humphrey of Lancaster, 1st Duke of Gloucester: ‘medicina domini Gilberti Kymer quam dedit illustri principi duci gloucester’.

16. 69r-70v
Treatise on uroscopy
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 69r Cum in humano corpore sunt .4. qualitates scilicet calida sicca humida et frigida
Explicit: 70v Item si furfure resoluciones fuit disperse per totum corpus urine significat tocius corporis dissolucionem vniversalem

The treatise features sections beginning: ‘Iste est modus iudicandi vrinas’ and ‘In vrina mulierum spermaticum contentum admixtum rubedini’.

The treatise is followed by uroscopic diagrams on ‘Circulus’ and ‘Spuma’.

eTK 0306A
Moulinier (2007)
17. 71r-72v
Modus medendi Gerard of Cremona
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 71r De vnguentis - De vnguento marcyaton / De vnguento arrogon / De vnguento dyaltea / De vnguento agrippa / De vnguento populeon / De vnguento citrion / De vnguento albo
Explicit: 72v Item ad menstrua prouocanda . butir resinam terbentinam olium rosis . equis pondibus admisce et utere
Final rubric: 72v Explicit modus medendi gerardi cremon deo gracias . quod tenet

The work is accompanied by a circular diagram in brown ink (see f. 72v (lower half)).

A 17th-century hand has added the title ‘Gerard Cremon’ to the upper margin of the page.

eTK 1599K
18. 72v
Diagram showing the correspondence between the elements, humours, times of the year, and parts of the world
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 72v Concordancia elementorum temperorum humorum et mundi partium

The diagram consists of six concentric circles that have been divided into 12 sections. At the centre of the diagram are the words: ‘mundus / tempus / homo / Elementum’.

19. 73r-76v
A uroscopic treatise, known as Signa Richardus Anglicus
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 73r Qui cupit vrina in ea compendia scire
Explicit: 76v per vrinam haberi posse credo cognicionem
Final rubric: 76v Hic igitur regularum finis cognitus secundum magistrum ricardium de monte pessulano qui fuit magister gilberti et intitulantur. Signa Ricardi . Quod tenet

The final rubric attributes the treatise to Richardus Anglicus (fl. c. 1180). The latter was considered to be the most learned and experienced physician in England by Gilbertus Anglicus (d. c. 1250), who must be the 'Magister Gilbert' to whom the rubric refers. This probably is a copy of the Signa by Richardus Anglicus (for this work, see H. H. Beusing, 'Leben und Werke des Richardus Anglicus, samt einem erstmaligen Abdruck seiner Schrift Signa' (unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universität Leipzig, ?1922).

Below the treatise is a note about the differences between the urine of humans and animals; and a verse from the Regiminen sanitatis Salernitatum: ‘De prope spissa magis hominis minctura uidetur / Non liquor est alius cui talis regula detur’.

20. 77r-77v
Tractatus omnium membrorum distemperatorum in calidate et frigiditate
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 77r Incipit tractatus omnium membrorum distemperatorum in calidate et frigiditate
Explicit: 77v [Glca] sunt ia que ponuntur contra distu ca. capitis
Final rubric: 77v Et sic est finis deo gracias tenet

A 15th-century hand has added the title: ‘ Contra distemperanciam omnium membrorum in primo ?compendio’ to the upper margin of f. 77r.

The first section after the introduction begins: ‘Hee sunt herbe contra discrasiam capitis’. Other copies of this treatise seem to occur in Continental manuscripts: Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS Lat. 6891 , ff. 80v-82r (‘Tractatus medicinarum omnium membrorum distemperatorum’); Vatican City, Vatican Library, Pal. Lat. MS 1183 , ff. g recto-k recto (untitled, begins: ‘Herbe contra discrasiam frigidam capitis’) [partly corresponds with the treatise in Cambridge, Trinity College, MS O.8.2]; and Vienna, Österreichische Nationalbibliothek, Cod. 2531 , ff. 77r-79r (‘Tractatus brevis et utiliis medicinarum omnium membrorum, tam in calliditate, quam in frigiditate’).

21. 78r
List of chapters for a treatise on pulses
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 78r In tractatu pulsuum per capitula ista primo sunt notanda quam in hoc libro ordinata convenienter
Explicit: 78r De signis vite et mortis in pulsu percipiendis
22. 78r-80r
Treatise on the pulsus
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 78r Pulsus ut dicit philaretus est mocio cordis et arteriarum
Explicit: 80r Multe enim egritudines quae sunt per pulsus iudicari non possunt
Final rubric: 80r Explicit tractatus de pulsibus . tenet
eTK 1151E
23. 80r-80v
Treatise on urine
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 80r Urina alba uel glauca uel pallida uel subpallida et tenuis melancholiam significat
Explicit: 80v Vrina in continuis febribus alba et spissa veniens febre non deficiente litargiam significat
24. 80v
Tract on urine (a subsection of the previous)
Incipit: 80v Regule platearij collecte sub compendio
Incipit: 80v Vrina subcitrina cuius superior pars apposita manu liuet cum resolucionibus in finido . vicium gutte significat . siue resolucionibus vicium pectoris
Explicit: 80v Incrudatur enim mu uel sit admixtio alterius humoris
25. 80v
On women's urine
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 80v In libro magistri Roberti scribitur quod vrina fere super perturbata reperitur in muliere . sana uel infirma
Explicit: 80v In alijs non febribus et in calefactione epatis longam egritudinem significat
26. 83-90r
Collection of 190 medical, chemical, and culinary recipes (with marginal recipes and charms added by Richard Tenet)
Language(s): Latin, Middle English, and Middle French

The collection begins imperfectly due to the loss of preceding folios. Aside from medical recipes, it also contains a section of chemical recipes for making pigments on ff. 86v-87r: scarlet (‘Si vis facere vermiculum’), white lead (‘Si vis facere cerusam plumbi’), and red lead (‘Si uis facere plumbum rubeum’). F. 87r contains a Middle English recipe for making gingerbread: ‘ffor to make gingerbred’; a method for writing on iron: ‘Scribere in ferro’; and an explanation of apothecary weights and symbols, beginning: ‘Nota quod libra medicinalis diuiditur in .12. uncias’.

A number of recipes are attributed to medical practitioners: One recipe on f. 88r is attributed to a Peter, chancellor of Montpellier (‘Item secundum magistrum petrum cancellarium in monte pess[ulane]’). One recipe is said to be taken from the "Book [of] Wynteby" (‘In libro Wynteby’) on f. 89r. One recipe is attributed to Platearius on f. 89r. Two recipes on f. 89v are said to have been proved by (‘probatur secundum eundem William barbitousorem parisiensis’).

Richard Tenet has added various recipes to the margins of the collection. One recipe in the outer margin of f. 83v is said to have been proved by ‘Platearius’. Among the added recipes are a few charms. One is a charm against poison in humans or animals on f. 83r (lower margin)): ‘Experimentum probatum contra omnem venenum . Scribe hec tria nomina in pane cum stilo . max . nax . pax. et da .3. diebus. primo die primum . postea aliud . 3o 3m. Si sit homo da in nomine patris et filii et spiritus sancti amen . Si sit aliquod animal . da in nomine salvatoris sui’ [see Jones (2024), p. 68, fn. 103 for an English translation and transcription]. Another on f. 83v (upper margin) gives a method of gaining protection against toothache (an example of folk magic / ritual medicine) associated with a certain John Lynnyngton, who learned it from an old woman: ‘Who so parith þe naylis of all his toys . and all his feyngrys sayungge at euery nayle paryn[g] a pater noster and an aue and att euery fyfte pater . aue. and credo and close þe parynges in a fyre lynne cloth and make an hole in an elder tre and put all hem to þer inne he schall neuer haue þe toþe ache after . John Lynnyngton of an olde woman leryd þis medicyn for trewthe’ (full transcription). This may be the John Lynnyngton/Lymyngton/Lymyton recorded as a Carmelite friar (fl. 1432-1452), who may have known Tenet at Oxford (see Richard Copsey, Biographical Register of Carmelites in England and Wales, 1240-1540 (Faversham: Saint Albert's Press, 2020)).

A third charm to staunch blood is on f. 86r: ‘Ad stringendum sanguinem in omni parte corporis mira medicina millees [sic: probably ‘millefoiles’ since milfoil or yarrow has long been used to stop nosebleeds] et experta a quod cirurgico in vasconia: Accede ad locum vbi crescit sanguis et flexis genibus dic pater noster et aue . et hic uersus . Te ergo quaesumus tuis fa[mulis] subueni quos precioso sanguine redemisti . tunc accipitur herba et ponitur in panno lineo ut fine panno fricetur ne patiens sciat qualis herba sit . et apponatur loco cruentanti . et si plures colliges pro qualibet et pater et aue et uer[sus] dicas’. Among the additions, as Jones (2024) points out is also a magical method for finding the body of a drowned person by anointing a stick with the blood of their nearest relative and using it as a divining rod (see f. 85r).

Remedy for infertility on f. 87v (full transcription):| Medicina uera et sepius approbata, ut mulier concipiat quamcumque sterilis fuerit. Recipe testiculos trium uel quartum mustelarum et semiplenum manum de mowsere iuniore et combure in olla rudi omnia pariter. Postea pulueriza et pasta cum succo herbe predicte, et fac inde pillas mollis ad modum nuclei auellane, et, per locum secretum tam profunde imponatur quae matricem attingat, et iaceat ibi per tres dies, in quibus omnio abstineat a coitu, post hos autem cum viro coiat et sine mora concipiat. |Full translation:| A true medicine, and often proven, so that a woman may conceive however sterile she may be. Take three or four weasel testicles and half a handful of young mouse-ear [a plant] and burn it all equally in an earthenware pot. Afterwards, grind and combine with the juice of the aforementioned herb, and thus make soft pills in the manner of a hazelnut kernel, and place them so deeply in the private parts that they touch the uterus, and leave there for three days, during which she should abstain entirely from sex. After these three days, however, she should have intercourse with a man and she should conceive without delay.

27. 90r-90v
Health regimen against pestilence
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 90r Contra pestilenciam - dieta salubris
Incipit: 90r Sit cibus bone digestionis et facilis sumatur que frequenter in parua quantitate per vna vite
Explicit: 90v ut ab omnibus intelligerer qui omnibus proficere in hoc opusculo per optam
28. 90v
Treatise against pestilence
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 90v [...] tractatus contra pestilenciam
Incipit: 90v Consulo vniuersis a pestilencie discrimine se curare volentibus vomitum spiritualem sepius exercere eiectim videlicet pestifere materie peccatorum animam corrumpentis
Explicit: 90v a sompnio cito post prandium sub[...]
Final rubric: 90v Sit cibus etcaetera [...] quod tenet

Physical Description

Secundo Folio: 5r: et dicitur ab ycomos
Form: codex
Support: Parchment (ff. 4, 13, 14, 17-18, 23) and Paper, folded in quarto. Folios 1r-90v: bull's head, scales, hand with ?glass.
Extent: Codex: 82 leaves. 205-215 × 150 mm.

Collation

  • Quire 210 (ff. 4-13)
  • Quire 310-2+2 (ff. 14-23: 3rd-4th leaves missing and 1 bifolium inserted after the 5th leaf)
  • Quire 48 (ff. 24-32)
  • Quire 512 (ff. 34-46)
  • Quire 614 (ff. 47-60)
  • Quire 78 (ff. 61-68)
  • Quire 812 (ff. 69-80)
  • Quire 98 (ff. 83-90)

The upper margins of three leaves feature marks but their significance is not apparent: f. 15v: ‘Q’; f. 16r: ‘R’; and f. 19v: ‘S’.

Catchwords in decorative banderols of red ink in the lower margins of Quires 5 and 6 (see ff. 46v and 60v).

Layout

170-195 × 110-115 mm. No ruling visible except for ff. 4v-94 where both frames and lines are ruled in ink. Single columns except for ff. 6r-10v which feature 2 columns. 50-64 lines to the page.

Hand(s)

Folios 4r-90v were copied, and subsequently annotated, by the Carmelite friar Richard Tenet (fl. 1418-after 1422) (see his colophons on ff. 5v, 10v, 13r, 27v, 68r, 72v, 76v, 77v, 80r, 90v, in a cursive script with both anglicana and secretary features.

Decoration

A scientific circular diagram in brown ink on f. 72v, showing the correspondence between the elements, humours, times of the year, and parts of the world.

A drawing of a urine flask (jordan) in brown ink integrated into the text on f. 36r.

Decorative banderols in brown ink with sub-headings to texts added to the margins, e.g. see ff. 73r-76v.

Large (1-4 lines) initials outlined or coloured in brown ink, sometimes featuring minor forms of decoration (e.g. the initial ‘J’ features a fish on f. 78r; and the initial ‘U’ features floral motifs inside the letter on f. 80r).

One large (1-3 lines) initial outlined or coloured in red ink on ff. 52r and 73r.

Headings and explicits written in red ink in the margins (perhaps indicating that these were added after the manuscript's main contents were written).

Small (1 line) initials in dark ink occasionally higlighted with red ink.

Paraphs in red ink.

Underlining in red ink.

Additions

The outer margins of ff i recto and 1r contain an index to the manuscript in a 17th-century hand.

Folio 13v features a partial index to remedies. As Jones (2024) notes, the index was copied by the 15th-century foliator.

History

Origin: First half of the 15th century. ; England.

Provenance

Richard Tenet (fl. 1418-after 1422) , Carmelite friar: the manuscript was copied in large part and annotated by Tenet (see Script, above, and Provenance in the parent section of the description).

Additional Information

Record Sources

This catalogue entry draws on M.R. James, The Western Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge: A Descriptive Catalogue, 3 (1902); and Linne R. Mooney, Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge The Index of Middle English Prose, Handlist XI (Woodbridge: Brewer, 1995).

Availability

Visitors to Trinity College who wish to consult Special Collections material are required to apply to the Library in advance of their visit. For information on eligibility and admission procedures see: Trinity College: Information for Readers.

Custodial History

The manuscript was displayed as part of the exhibition Curious Cures: Medicine in the Medieval World (Cambridge University Library, 29 March-6 December 2025) (ff. 83v-84r and 87-88r).

Bibliography

    The Western Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge: A Descriptive Catalogue, James, M.R. (Cambridge, 3, Cambridge University Press, 1902) Manuscripts in the Library of Trinity College, Cambridge Index of Middle English prose, Mooney, Linne R. (Woodbridge, D.S. Brewer, 1995) La science des urines de Maurus de Salerne et les Sinthomata Magistri Mauri inédits La scuola medica salernitana: gli autori e i testi: convegno internazionale Università degli Studi di Salerno, 3-5 novembre 2004, Moulinier-Brogi, Laurence (Florence, 261-282, SISMEL, Edizioni del Galluzzo, 2007) The Medicine of the Friars in Medieval England Health and Healing in the Middle Ages, Jones, Peter Murray (Woodbridge, Boydell & Brewer, 2024)

Funding of Cataloguing

Wellcome (cataloguing). All images provided by Trinity College, Cambridge.

Digital Images

Cambridge Digital Library