Medieval Manuscripts in Cambridge Libraries

A catalogue of Western manuscripts and papyri at Cambridge University Library, the Fitzwilliam Museum and selected Cambridge colleges

Cambridge, Peterhouse, MS 178

Medical texts

Contents

Introduction: Peterhouse MS 178 contains a compilation of medical and scientific texts copied in the 14th century by a single scribe and then extensively corrected and annotated by that scribe and several further medieval hands. Peterhouse MS 178 comprises codicological units (ff. 1r-244v and 225r-310v), both written by the same scribe, but prepared with a different mise-en-page in each unit, i.e., in single-column format in ff. 1-244 and double-column format in ff. 225-310. The main scribe copied the texts in a calligraphic although somewhat error-prone gothic rotunda throughout and made additions and corrections in the margins in that same gothic rotunda hand, enclosing the corrections within a partial red frame, see e.g., f. 17v 'In mane' in the outer margin correcting 'In marie'. Rod Thomson localised the main scribe to the Low Countries and as such, the volume must have arrived in England soon after it was copied as there are marginal notes in a 14th century English hand on ff. 45v ('Nota Elmam'), 51v ('Lok wel'), 66v ('Nota Ryde ... ... est quod(?)'), 125r ('Scharp lok þis') and 170r ('Lo Robyn'). In his Catalogue of the Peterhouse manuscripts, Thomson drew attention to this group of annotations as he had noticed their similarity to annotations in two other Peterhouse manuscripts, MSS 109, 150; and suggested that the annotations in all three manuscripts may be teaching notes where the teacher is encouraging students to consult particular passages and 'Lok wel'. Thomson has also cautiously suggested that these teaching marginalia could be in the hand of the former master of Peterhouse, Ralph Holbeche (d. c. 1373-1374) as identified a note on Peterhouse MS 109 f. 252v signed 'Rad Holbech' that appears to be in the same hand as the teaching-annotations in that volume and MSS 150 and 178. Dr Sarah Gilbert| Project Cataloguer| Curious Cures in Cambridge Libraries References: |
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), nos 109, 150, 178
Venn: ACAD (no number, search 'Holbeche')

Language(s): Latin, with occasional notes in Middle English

1. 1r-9r
Tabule magistri Richardi cum commento magistri Iohannis de ⟨Sancto Paulo⟩ Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 1r Incipiunt tabule magistri Richardi cum commento .desuper. quas compilauit magister idem
Incipit: 1r Columna prima | de emagoga | Cassia fistula
Explicit: 9r Saluiam | Castoreum
Final rubric: 9r Expliciunt tabule cum commento magistri Johannis de sancto paulo

According to Thomson, Peterhouse MS 178 contains the only copy of this text.

The attribution of this text to Richardus Anglicus is not confirmed by any other sources.

eTK 0195E (t0037310000)
eTK 0235L (t0045130000)
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016)
2. 9v-37r
Commentary on the Tabula remediorum Salernita Bernard of Provence
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 9v Incipiunt Glosule tabule salerni cum commento
Incipit: 9v Omnis practicus est theoricus sed non conuertitur . salernus est practicus . ergo theoricus
Explicit: 37r sermonis igitur lasciuientis riuulum pregnantem hic stagnare faciamus feliciter
Final rubric: 37r Deo gratias Explicit commentum magistri Richardi
Edited, not from this MS in Collectio Salernitana, 5 (1859), pp. 233-328
eTK 1001A (t0192190000) where it is posited as being by Richard of Wendover
3. 37v-40r
De crisi Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 37v Incipit de crisi que non fit in nisi in egritudinibus uelocis motus
Incipit: 37v Crisis non fit nisi in egritudinibus uelocis motus et ille dicuntur acute cum quibus est timor
Explicit: 40r et ista sunt ad salutem secundum quod dicit G. in libro de crisi
Final rubric: 40r Explicit . de crisi

According to Thomson, Peterhouse MS 178 contains the only copy of this text.

The attribution of this text to Richardus Anglicus is not confirmed by any other sources.

eTK 0274M (t0053420000)
Sharpe, Handlist, p. 470
4. 40r-42v
De phlebotomia
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 40r Incipit in quibus egritudinibus competat flebotomia
Incipit: 40r Requirendum est nobis breuiter in quibus egritudinibus flebotomia competit . et de quibus uenis . nota quod minutio quaedam sit per metatesim quadam per antipasim . per metatesim dicitur
Explicit: 42v sciatica quia eius incisio ualet contra sciaticam passionem
Final rubric: 42v Flebotomia magistri rogeri \Richardi/ hic explicit

This text is attributed to Roger of Salerno in Thomson's Catalogue, but the Voigts article about this treatise does not identify an author of this text. The final rubric initially attributed the text to a 'Roger' (presumably Roger of Salerno ), but the scribe then corrected the attribution to 'Richardi' (presumably Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) ). In other manuscripts, this text is attributed to Henry of Winchester .

See E. Wickersheimer, Dictionnaire biographique des médicins en France au moyen âge p. 697
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. p. 105
Edited (not from this MS) and discussed in L. E. Voigts, and M. R. McVaugh, 'A Latin Technical Phlebotomy and Its Middle English Translation', Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, 74.2 (1984), pp. 1-69 [doi.org/10.2307/1006388]
eTK 1349F (t0258120000)
5. 42v-82v
Signa (Micrologus, part 5) Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 42v Incipiunt capitula de signis Richardi
Rubric: 43v Incipiunt signa ricardi
Incipit: (capitula) 42v De signis remotionis et propinquitatis et status
Incipit: (text) 43v Finis medicine laudabilis existis . Cum auctor in singulis ualitudininbus
Explicit: (text) 82v et praecipue cum lingue nigredine signum est mortale
Final rubric: 82v Expliciunt hic

The Micrologus of Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) has not survived in a single complete manuscript copy with a prologue and the parts arranged 1-5; nevertheless one or more of its parts are extant in various combinations in over 30 manuscripts. See Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-474 for further information.

Partially edited in H. H. Beusing, Das Leben und Werke des Ricardus Anglicus (PhD thesis, Leipzig, 1922), esp. pp. 32-42
TK 561
Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 472-473
6. 82v-129r
⟨Tractatus febrium et aliarum passionum diuersarum⟩ Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 82v Incipit tractatus febrium et aliarum passionum diuersarum a magistro Richardo compositus hac enim practica obtima[sic] est et mirabilis
Incipit: 82v Ex universalibus in quibus consistist ars medicinalis et finitur elitiuntur
Explicit: 129r cum salle et melle superpo⟨s⟩itum confert
Final rubric: 129r Explicit

According to Thomson, Peterhouse MS 178 contains the only copy of this text.

Sharpe, Handlist, p. 474
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. p. 105
eTK 0538E (t0104970000)
7. 129v-134v
De medicinis repressiuis (Micrologus, part 4) Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 129v Tractatus Repressiuarum Magistri Richardi
Incipit: (prologue) 129v Laxatiua solent multum laxando nocere . Sed tamen arcis opere nocumenta . potes remouere
Incipit: (text) 129v Aloe est quia a prima litera incipit erit principium
Explicit: 134v abiectum totum medium huius pisciculi pro una dosi accipias uel offeras et per uin cum optimo modo conficias ||

The Micrologus of Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) has not survived in a single complete manuscript copy with a prologue and the parts arranged 1-5; nevertheless one or more of its parts are extant in various combinations in over 30 manuscripts. See Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-474 for further information.

Sharpe, Handlist, p. 471
eTK 0814E (t0156580000)
8. 135r-142r
Regulae de urinis (Micrologus, part 2) Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: || 135r tor de singulius humorum differenciis geminam
Explicit: 142r ypostasim . in fundo et crassam

The Micrologus of Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) has not survived in a single complete manuscript copy with a prologue and the parts arranged 1-5; nevertheless one or more of its parts are extant in various combinations in over 30 manuscripts. See Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-474 for further information.

Not listed at Sharpe, Handlist, p. 472
TK 223 1247
9. 142r-150v
Anatomia (Micrologus, part 3) Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 142r Incipit tractatus anathomie
Incipit: 142r Galieno testante in Tegni Quicunque interiorum membrorum cognitor esse desiderat . ipsum in anathomia diligentem esse operet
Explicit: 150v Qui cupit \ars/ nostra materia per compendia scire . Hoc legat assidue nec potest oportet longius ire
Final rubric: 150v Explicit anathomia

The Micrologus of Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) has not survived in a single complete manuscript copy with a prologue and the parts arranged 1-5; nevertheless one or more of its parts are extant in various combinations in over 30 manuscripts. See Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-474 for further information.

Edited (not from this MS) in K. Sudhoff, 'Der "Micrologus"-Text Der "Anatomia" Richards Des Engländers', Archiv Für Geschichte Der Medizin, 19.3 (1927), pp. 209–239
Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-470
eTK 0575K
10. 150v-151v
Prologue to the Micrologus Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 150v Summa magistri Richardi incipit
Incipit: (prologue) 150v Si quod agam solitum preter ueniam date cuncti | Nec uos offendat si noua grata canam | Suppositam modis retegit candelabra lucem | Ut sit commune quod fuit(?) ante meum | Sicut odor nardi spirabit sermo rigardi | Splendet mircrologi lux Quasi flama[sic] rogi
Incipit: (text) 150v Si uenerande uetustati sicut moderne nouitati . ex sola fuisset olim studiorum negociorum ue[sic] prolixitas
Explicit: 151v Igitur ars prius insurget in ca⟨usa⟩m que magis uiget . Dampnaque maiora releuet prius . inde minora

The Micrologus of Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) has not survived in a single complete manuscript copy with a prologue and the parts arranged 1-5; nevertheless one or more of its parts are extant in various combinations in over 30 manuscripts. See Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-474 for further information.

This text only survives in one other manuscript, Paris, Bibliothèque nationale de France, MS Lat. 6957, ff. 37rv ; in BNF MS Lat. 6957, the poem at the opening of the prologue in Peterhouse MS 178 ('Si quod agam ... Quasi flama[sic] rogi') is at the end of the text.

Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-470
Printed from the BNF MS in K. Sudhoff, 'Richard der Engländer', Janus. Archives internationales pour l'histoire de la médecine et pour la géographie médicale 28 (1924, pp. 397-403
Partially edited in H. Hellriegel, diss. (Leipzig, 1934), pp. 9-10
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. p. 105
eTK 1463I (t0279860000)
11. 151v-193v
Practica (Micrologus, part 1) Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 151v De acutis egritudinibus
Incipit: 151v Acutarum egritudinum . alia est terciana de colera rubera
Explicit: 193r cum succo anoglosse sed tamen utiliter adhibeatur primo flebotomia
Final rubric: 193r Explicit summa magistri richardi

The Micrologus of Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180) has not survived in a single complete manuscript copy with a prologue and the parts arranged 1-5; nevertheless one or more of its parts are extant in various combinations in over 30 manuscripts. See Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 468-474 for further information.

Partially edited in E. Frers, diss. (Leipzig, 1934)
Partially edited in H. Hellriegel, diss. (Leipzig, 1934)
Sharpe, Handlist, pp. 471-472
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. p. 105
eTK 0029B (t0005710000)
12. 193r-194r
De criticis diebus Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 193r De creticis[sic] diebus R’
Incipit: 193r Creticorum[sic] uero dierum ypo⟨crates⟩ duas rationes adinuenit . unam pertinarium aliam per quaternarium
Explicit: 194r et hic est spatium ccclxv. dierum et ui. horarum
Final rubric: 194r Explicit de creticis[sic] diebus

This appears to be the only surviving copy of this text.

Sharpe, Handlist, p. 470
eTK 0274G (t0053360000)
13. 194r-201v
De pulsibus Richardus Anglicus (fl. 1180)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 194r Incipit de pulsibus secndum magistrum Richardum philosofum
Incipit: 194r Pulsus est operatio uirtutis spiritualis
Explicit: 201v uicina cordi et ei quod sunt(?) iuxta cor Et hec sunt de pulsibus quod auctoritate antiquorum dicere proposuimus
Final rubric: 201v Explicit tractatus magistri Richardi de pulsibus

Also in Oxford, New College, MS 167 and a lost manuscript, Wroclaw, Biblioteka Uniwersytecka, Rehdigeriana (olim Biblioteka Miejska) 1302, for which a ?partial 19th century copy exists, Wroclaw, Biblioteka Uniwersytecka, M 1303 .

Sharpe, Handlist, p. 470
Edited in A. Hesse, diss. (Leipzig, 1922)
eTK 1151A (t0221140000)
14. 201v-202r
Text on pulses
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 201v Et relique species . Diuersa genera pulsuum . auc iste in precedentibus posuit
Explicit: 202r de inequali autem et inequale non hunc medium . in hoc conueniunt omnes auctores
Final rubric: 202r Explicit
15. 202r
Versus de ponderibus
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 202r Versus de ponderibus
Incipit: 202r Collige triticeis medicine pondera granis . Grana quater quinque scrupulum pro pondere sume
Explicit: 202r Librarum v. potis pondus mediare
eTK 0234D (t0044780000)
WIC 3027
16. 202r
Etymologiae 16:27 - De signis ponderum Isidore of Seville
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 202r De signis ponderum
Incipit: 202r Ponderis signa plerisque ignota errorem legentibus faciunt
Explicit: 202r quod Graeci oxifalon vocant M \M/ Graecum superposita .N. latina significat minam
eTK 1059I (t0203800000)
17. 202v-207r
De conferentibus et nocentibus
Language(s): Latin
17.1. 202v-207r
De conferentibus et nocentibus pseudo-Arnaldus de Villanova
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 202v Incipiunt conferentie et primo de conferentiis cerebri
Incipit: 202v Conferunt cerebro ^fetida^ in graui opilatione cerebri . in maiori apoplexia
Explicit: 207r omnes carnes et pisces . per salem indurata et exiccati omne nimis uentosum

Similar to the version of this text in Cambridge, St John's College, MS D.24, ff. 349r-352r .

This text is often attributed to Arnaldus de Villanova , but it is generally not thought to be one of this authentic works.

Note that this version of the text is not particularly close to the standard edition of the text printed in Lyon in 1504.

Standard edition of the text is Hec sunt opera Arnaldi de Villanoua que in hoc volumine continentur, (François Fradin, Lyon, 1504), ff. 302r-313v
eTK 0246H (t0047420000)
17.2. 207r
Addition to De conferentibus et nocentibus
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 207r De nocumento ueneris . Nocet uenus omnibus arthriticis
Explicit: 207r et sic de aliis intellige
Final rubric: 207r Explicit conferentie

The text from f. 207r ln 8. seq. to the bottom of f. 207r is treated by the scribe as part of De conferentibus et nocentibus, but the two sub-sections of text headed ‘De nocumentio ueneris’ and ‘De uiuamento veneris’ do not seem to be part of any other surviving copy of this text.

18. 207v-220v
De modo medendi [Latin]
Language(s): Latin
18.1. 207v-208r
Capitula to De modo medendi
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 207v Incipiunt capitula de modo medendi
Incipit: 207v De modo medendi quot et quibus modus medemur . De primo modo et prius secundum modu in quo continetur materia est preparatione potionandi
Explicit: 208r De electuariis quibus proprie dari debeant et de laxativis
Edited in Renzi, IV:415-416
18.2. 208r-220v
Capitula to De modo medendi
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 208r De modo medendi
Incipit: 208r In medendis corporibus et maxime purgandis uariis sepere molestamur in comodis
Explicit: 220v et sic panset[sic] infirmus fit etiam alteratio tam cibis quam potibus quam medicinis conuentibus ||
Final rubric: 220v Explicit modo medendi

Ends early at Renzi, IV:434.

Edited in Renzi, IV:416-438

Variously attributed to either Gerard of Cremona (c. 1113/1114 – 1187) or Gerard of Montpellier (13th century).

eTK 0691A (t0133720000)
19. 220v-224v
De conficiendis medicinis Copho
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 220v Incipit modus conficiendi
Incipit: 220v Executo modo medendi agendum est de modo conficiendi . ostendamus ergo quomodo deberant confici medicine
Explicit: 224v quia magis dissoluerent quam consumerent et sic lederent
Final rubric: 224v Explicit modus medendi cophonis
eTK 0540B (t0105350000)
20. 225r-263r
Quaestiones Salernitanae
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 225r Incipiunt questiones sollempnes Salernitane
Incipit: 225r Queritur quare gallus facit in senectute et non in iuuentute et cuius ex ouo nascitur serpens qui moritur ex solo odore rute solutio . Gallus naturaliter est colericus
Explicit: 263r et in eis enim concauitates sunt et calor et humiditas quia uermes generare ac nutrire possunt
Edited as siglum 'P' in B. Lawn (ed.), The Prose Salernitan Questions: edited from a Bodleian manuscript (Auct. F.3.10): an anonymous collection dealing with science and medicine written by an Englishman c. 1200, with an appendix of ten related collections, Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, 5 (London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1979), esp. 'Appendix P' pp. xi, 204-261 and p. 108.
eTK 1196M (t0229340000)
21. 263r-266v
Extracts from works by Urso of Salerno including De coloribus Urso of Salerno
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 263r Incipit tractatus de coloribus s⟨ecundum⟩ m⟨agister⟩ Ul’
Incipit: 263r Tractaturi de coloribus primo quid sit color \uideamus/ et quod sunt species coloris
Explicit: 266r cum gustu per cipiatur magis compilationem rei declinat declarat substantia quam color
Final rubric: 266r Et hec de coloribus breuiter dicta sufficiant

Similar arrangements of this text can be found in:

Includes recipes for iron gall ink and for various coloured pigments.

Edited, not from this MS, in L. Thorndike, ‘Some Medieval Texts on Colours’, Ambix, 7.1 (1959), pp. 1–24 doi.org/10.1179/amb.1959.7.1.1
D. W. Singer, A. Anderson, R. Addis, Catalogue of Latin and Vernacular Alchemical Manuscripts in Great Britain and Ireland Dating from before the XVI Century, 3 vols (Brussels: Maurice Lamertin, 1928), II, p. 597, no. 877.1
M. Clarke, The Art of All Colours: Mediaeval Recipe Books for Painters and Illuminators (London: Archetype Publications, 2001), p. 64, no. 260
eTK 1578E (t0301290000)
22. 266r-267r
Unidentified text on odours and sense of smell
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: || 266r ⟨a⟩marum percepimus . tamen in instrumentis uisus puncturam et morsuram sentimus cum ibi colliria et huius apponimus . Alii dicebant nullo modo substantam rei percipi odore . Hanc ostendentes ratonem[sic]
Explicit: 267r gustus non delectetur a tali sapore immutatus
Final rubric: 267r Explicit tractatus de coloribus

Lacks rubric and perhaps opening words of the text.

D. W. Singer, A. Anderson, R. Addis, Catalogue of Latin and Vernacular Alchemical Manuscripts in Great Britain and Ireland Dating from before the XVI Century, 3 vols (Brussels: Maurice Lamertin, 1928), II, p. 597, no. 877.2
23. 267r-275v
Questiones magistri Lorentii
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 267r Incipiunt questiones magistri . lor .
Incipit: 267r Quidam in febre amisit memoriam litterarum Solutio . febris fuit in cerebro . uel in aliqua parte habente colligantiam cum cerebro
Explicit: 275v Unde consumitur materia qua consumpta deficit febris
Final rubric: 275v Explicit tractatus de coloribus

In his edition of the prose Salernitan questions, Lawn draws attention to the similarity of the versions of this text in this manuscript and in Oxford, Bodleian Library, MS Auct. F.3.10, ff. 154r-161v . Lawn also suggests that this is the same text recorded as 'questiones Salernitane a magro loz composite' by M. R. James in Ancient Libraries, no. 1236, p. 342. According to Lawn (p. xvii) this 'magister Lorentius seems to be otherwise unknown in Salernitan literature'.

Edited as siglum 'L' in B. Lawn (ed.), The Prose Salernitan Questions: edited from a Bodleian manuscript (Auct. F.3.10): an anonymous collection dealing with science and medicine written by an Englishman c. 1200, with an appendix of ten related collections, Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, 5 (London: Oxford University Press for the British Academy, 1979), esp. 'Appendix Ba' and 'Appendix L' pp. xi, xvii, 156-203.
eTK 1245F (t0238850000)
24. 275v-310v
Tractatus de naturali philosophia
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 275v Incipit tractatus de naturali philosophia
Incipit: 275v Studentibus in naturali philosophia primo uidendum est quid sit exterior cognitio naturaliter philosophie
Explicit: 310v quidam dicunt quod sicut ignis nex ||

According to Thomson, Peterhouse MS 178 contains the only copy of this text.

Ends imperfectly.

eTK 1529I (t0292660000)

Physical Description

Secundo Folio: 2r: Lapis agapis
Form: codex
Support: Parchment.
Extent: Codex: 310 leaves. 275 × 205 mm.
Foliation:

Early 21st-century foliation (incorporating some of the partial foliation of the 19th century).

Folios 1-224; 225-310

Foliated in pencil in Hindu-Arabic numerals in the upper outer corner of the recto of each leaf.
Foliation:

Deprecated 19th- or 20th-century foliation.

This manuscript was previously understood to be composite, with Part 1 comprising the present ff. 1-224 and Part 2 comprising the present ff. 225-310; it seems that at some point while the manuscript was viewed as a composite volume it was given an additional foliation sequence which restarted at 'f. 1' at the present f. 225, and some folio designations in this sequence were added to the volume, i.e., folios '51' (for the present 275r) to '84' (for the present ff. 309r)

A deprecated foliation sequence in pencil in Hindu-Arabic numerals in the upper outer corner of the recto of some of the leaves towards the end of the manuscript - these foliation sigla have been struck through in pencil to indicate that they are no longer used.
Foliation:

14th- or 15th-century pagination

Paginated as pp. 3-245 for the present leaves ff. 1r-122r)

Paginated in light brown ink in the typical medieval forms of Hindu-Arabic numerals in the upper outer corner of the recto and verso of each leaf from the present leaves ff. 1r-122r.
Foliation:

14th- or 15th-century pagination

Paginated as pp. 244-395 for the present leaves ff. 121v-193r)

Paginated in drypoint in the medieval forms of Hindu-Arabic numerals in the centre of the upper margin of most leaves from ff. 121v-193r. This pagination sequence was in place before the loss of 5 leaves in Quire 12 between the present ff. 134v and 135r as this drypoint pagination sequence jumps from p. 270 (134v) to p. 281 (135r), which is consistent with the stubs and codicology that indicate the loss of 5 leaves from that quire. There is an error in this sequence at the present opening ff. 184v-185r which are drypoint-paginated as pp. 378-379, which is a repeat of the previous opening, ff. 183v-184r which are also (correctly within the context of this sequence) paginated as pp. 378-379. This pagination sequence can be quite difficult to see in normal (natural or artificial) lighting conditions, but there is a relatively clear example of p. 283 in this designation sequence on f. 136r.

Collation

Comprising two codicological units (ff. 1-224 and 225r-310v) written by the same scribe, but prepared with a different mise-en-page in each unit, and the quires arranged in the following way:

  • Quires 1-1112 (ff. 1-132)
  • Quire 1212-5 (ff. 133-139: 3rd-7th leaves missing)
  • Quires 13-1712 (ff. 140-199)
  • Quire 184 (ff. 200-203)
  • Quire 1912 (ff. 204-215)
  • Quire 2010-1 (ff. 216-224: 10th leaf excised, probably blank) ;
  • Quires 21-2312 (ff. 225-260)
  • Quire 2414 (ff. 261-274)
  • Quires 25-2612 (ff. 275-298)
  • Quire 2710+1 (ff. 299-309: 1st leaf inserted)
  • Quire 28one (f. 310: perhaps originally a bifolium, with the 2nd leaf missing)

1-1112 1212-5 (3rd-7th leaves missing) 13-1712 184 1912 2010-1 (10th excised, probably blank); 21-2312 2414 25-2612 2710+1 (1st leaf inserted) 28one (perhaps originally a bifolium, with the 2nd leaf missing)

Most leaf signatures trimmed away, but a 'vi' remains in the lower outer corner of the 6th leaf of Quire 19, i.e., f. 209r.

No medieval quire signatures.

Medieval catchwords in ink in the lower margin of the last verso of each quire, some partially trimmed away and many catchwords in the latter half of the volume enclosed in a red frame e.g., f. 175v.

Condition

In good condition, although text near the gutter can be difficult to read as the fragility of the hinges restricts the maximum angle of opening. The leaves have been trimmed for rebinding with minor losses to marginal text and decoration throughout, see e.g., the outer margin of f. 280r. Minor rodent damage at the lower outer corner of the leaves in the final fifth of the volume.

Layout

210 × 155 mm. Folios 1r-9r ruled in, frame and lines. Written in triple-column format for a capitula list, typically 33 lines to the column and written below top line.

210 × 155 mm. Folios 9v-224v ruled in crayon, frame and lines. Written in single-column format, typically 33 lines to the page and written below top line.

210 × 155 mm. Folios 225r-310v ruled in crayon, frame and lines. Written in double-column format, typically 33 lines to the column and written below top line.

Hand(s)

Written in a northern textualis rotunda by a single scribe. R. M. Thomson describes the work as being that of a 'Low Countries scribe' and also notes that he 'corrects his work in the margins, cancelling the error and framing the correction in red.' Although the mise-en-page changes from single- to double-column format at f. 225r, the same scribe is resonsible for the entirety of the volume and hand, rubrication pattern, and decoration are consistent throughout.

R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. pp. 105-106

Annotations in a cursiva Anglicana in the margins of ff. 45v, 51v, 66v, 125r, 170r by a scribe who R. M. Thomson also identifies in Cambridge, Peterhouse, MS 109 and Cambridge, Peterhouse, MS 150

R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. pp. 105-106

Decoration

Puzzle initial with additional flourishing at the opening of the volume on f. 1r and at the beginnings of occasional other texts throughout the volume. Flourished initials, e.g., 275v in red and blue at the major and minor divisions of the texts.

Inital letter of each line of the capitula list on ff. 1r-9r written in alternate red and blue 'lombardic' capitals.

Section headings rubricated throughout.

Line fills of red minims in the capitula list on ff. 1r-9r.

Additions

R. M. Thomson recorded annotations in Middle English in a cursiva Anglicana in the margins of ff. 45v ('Nota Elmam'), 51v ('Lok wel'), 66v ('Nota Ryde ... ... ...(?)'), 125r ('Scharp lok þis'), 170r ('Lo Robyn') by a scribe who R. M. Thomson also identifies in Peterhouse MS 109 and Peterhouse MS 150. Peterhouse MSS 109 and 150 are more extensively annotated by this scribe and Thomson cautiously suggests that he may be Ralph Holbeche (Venn:ACAD no number, search 'Holbeche') who was a fellow of Peterhouse in 1335, Master of Peterhouse c. 1345-?1349, and probably died c. 1373-1374.

R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. pp. 59-60, 90, 105-106
Venn:ACAD no number, search 'Holbeche'

Quire signatures ('a-p 1-4 u 1-8') in the bottom right-hand corner of the recto side of the first leaf of each quire, written in pencil by a hand of the 19th/20th century. These appear to reflect an earlier belief that the manuscript was a composite.

Binding

18th-century binding. Undecorated parchment cover over thin pasteboards. Six sewing stations tanglible as slightly raised bands on spine. Description of the contents of the volume written in ink on the spine in an 18th century hand, now almost completely erased. Small printed paper label fixed to spine bearing the shelfmark designation '178'.

Head and tail bands wrapped in cream, blue, and yellow yarn mostly lost or rolled inside the back ?due to abrasion.

The front pastedown is paper and contains:

  • 'James 178' in pencil
  • A list of some of the main textual items in the volume including:| Tabula cum Comto Mag.i Johannis de Sto Paulo see pag[sic] 19 | a Richardo phlebotomia 81 | Do de signis 86 | Do de febribus 166 | anathema 295 | Summa Richardi 312 | Do de ...(?) diebus 395 | de pulsibus 397 | Questiones Salernitanae

The rear pastedown is a blank leaf of medieval parchment.

The volume has blue and green thread bookmarks sewn into the outer margin of the opening leaves of a new text; some of these bookmarks have been lost or badly damaged.

Dimensions (L x W x D): 290 x 205 x 95

Stored in a grey archive box with "PETERHOUSE" written on the box in pencil and a printed label '178' fixed to the box with an adhesive.

History

Origin: 14th century. ; Low Countries, or perhaps England.

Perhaps copied in England by a scribe trained in the Low Countries. Date and place of production based on palaeographical, decorative, and biographical details.

M. R. James, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899)
R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016)

Provenance and Acquisition

Perhaps once owned by Ralph Holbeche , former Master of Peterhouse. As noted by Thomson, Peterhouse MS 178 has annotations in Middle English in a cursiva Anglicana in the margins of ff. 45v ('Nota Elmam'), 51v ('Lok wel'), 66v ('Nota Ryde ...'), 125r ('Scharp lok þis'), 170r ('Lo Robyn') by a scribe who Thomson also identifies in Peterhouse MS 109 and Peterhouse MS 150. Peterhouse MSs 109 and 150 are more extensively annotated by this scribe and Thomson cautiously suggests that he may be Ralph Holbeche as an annotation in MS 109 f. 252v is signed 'Rad Holbech') who was a fellow of Peterhouse in 1335, Master of Peterhouse c. 1345-?1349, and probably died c. 1373-1374 as an annotation.

R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016), esp. pp. 59-60, 90, 105-106
Venn:ACAD no number, search 'Holbeche'

The precise date of acquisition is unknown, but the manuscript was certainly at Peterhouse by 1418 as it is recorded in the 1418 inventory of the Peterhouse library. The early 15th-century inventory of the library is preserved in a document now known as the Registrum vetus ('The Old Register'). The Registrum vetus was begun in 1418 by a single scribe, and subsequent donations to the library were added by other members of the College throughout the 15th century. The reference to Peterhouse MS 178 occurs on p. 17 of the Registrum vetus where it is recorded as part of the original inventory of 1418 by the main scribe of the Registrum. The entry in the Registrum vetus for MS 178 is as follows: '‘Liber magistri Ricardi experti in qualibet parte medicine --- Incipit in 2o fo lapis in pe⟨nultimo⟩ de albedine’. The manuscript has retained the codicological form it had in 1418 as the secundo folio (f. 2r) and penultimate leaf (f. 310r keywords match those in the extant manuscript 'lapis' and 'de albedine' respectively.

CBMLC 10, UC48.298, pp. 517-518

Additional Information

Record Sources

This catalogue uses M. R. James, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1899) and draws extensively on R. M. Thomson, A Descriptive Catalogue of the Medieval Manuscripts in the Library of Peterhouse, Cambridge (Cambridge: D.S. Brewer, 2016). Readers are encouraged to consult both catalogues for further information about this manuscript.

Availability

Researchers should note that Peterhouse's western European medieval manuscripts are housed at Cambridge University Library. Scholars who wish to consult Peterhouse manuscripts should contact the Special Collections Reading Room to arrange their visit; all University Library admissions procedures will apply. For information on eligibility and admissions procedures, see Joining the Library. For further enquiries, and to confirm the availability of the manuscript, please contact the Special Collections Reading Room.

Custodial History

Recorded as no. 219 in the Ecloga Oxonio-Cantabrigiensis by Thomas James (1600).

Recorded as no. 1881 in Bernard, Catalogi librorum manuscriptorum Angliæ et Hiberniæ (c. 1697)

Recorded as MS 1.8.2 in the older '3 figure' shelfmark system once used in Peterhouse library.

Bibliography

    A descriptive catalogue of the manuscripts in the library of Peterhouse, James, M. R. (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1899) Catalogue of Latin and vernacular alchemical manuscripts in Great Britain and Ireland: dating from before the XVI century, Singer, Dorothea Waley (Brussels, Maurice Lamertin, 1928) The prose Salernitan questions, edited from a Bodleian manuscript (Auct. F.3.10): an anonymous collection dealing with science and medicine written by an Englishman c. 1200 with an appendix of ten related collections Auctores Britannici Medii Aevi, (London, Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press, 1979) A Latin Technical Phlebotomy and Its Middle English Translation Transactions of the American Philosophical Society, Voigts, Linda E.McVaugh, Michael R. (74, 2, 1, 1984, https://www.jstor.org/stable/1006388?origin=crossref) Les questions disputées et les questions quodlibétiques dans les facultés de théologie, de droit et de médecine Typologie des sources du moyen âge occidental, (Brepols, 44-45, 1985, http://www.brepols.net/Pages/ShowProduct.aspx?prod_id=IS-9782503360447-1) The art of all colours: mediaeval recipe books for painters and illuminators, Clarke, Mark (London, Archetype Publications, 2001) The University and college libraries of Cambridge Corpus of British Medieval Library Catalogues, Clarke, Peter D. (London, British library British academy, 2002) A descriptive catalogue of the medieval manuscripts in the library of Peterhouse, Cambridge, Thomson, R. M. (Cambridge, D.S. Brewer, 2016)

Funding of Cataloguing

Wellcome

Digital Images

Cambridge Digital Library