Medieval Manuscripts in Cambridge Libraries

A catalogue of Western manuscripts and papyri at Cambridge University Library, the Fitzwilliam Museum and selected Cambridge colleges

Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College, MS 366/588

Antidotarium magnum

Contents

Introduction: The main text of the manuscript is a 12th-century copy of the Antidotarium magnum, a text produced at the Abbey of Montecassino in the 11th century by or through the direction of a monk of Tunisian heritage known to modern scholarship as Constantinus Africanus (d. before 1098/1099) . The Antidotarium magnum was the first substantial medical work produced in western medieval Europe that presented medical recipes and ideas from Arabic sources alongside recipes deriving from Greek, Roman, and subsequent western European medical sources. The work has often been confused with a similar text, the Antidotarium Nicholai or Antidotarium paruum, which probably originates from the medical school at Salerno, and is based in part on the Antidotarium magnum. Indeed, M.R. James mistook the main text in this manuscript for the 'Antidotarium (Nicholai)' in his descriptive catalogue of 1907-08. The probable cause of the confusion of these two antidotaria is the fact that the first recipe in both antidotaria pertains to Aurea alexandrina. However, as Monica H. Green has observed, the Antidotarium Nicholai typically opens with a prefatory address by a 'Nicholaus', and the content of the Aurea alexandrina recipes differs between the two. For another example of a 12th-century copy of the Antidotarium magnum, see Cambridge, St John's College, MS G.4 . Dr Sarah Gilbert| Project Cataloguer| Curious Cures in Cambridge Libraries Bibliography:| M. H. Green, 'The Antidotarium Magnum: A Short Description' (2019), esp. n. 19

Physical Description

Form: codex
Support: Parchment (HFFH).
Extent: Codex: 4 | 92 | 4 leaves. 235 × 155 mm.
Foliation:

19th/20th-century foliation:

i-iv | 1-92 | 93-96

Foliated in pencil. The opening four endleaves are foliated on each recto as ff. i-iv and the closing 4 endleaves are foliated on each recto as ff. 93-96. The main part of the manuscript is foliated ff. 1-92, but folio numbers are only present on the first recto of each quire.

Collation

The main part of the manuscript comprises 11 quires of 8 leaves, and a final quire of 4 leaves. Eight leaves from an early 13th-century manuscript have been added as endleaves: four at the front, and four at the rear of the volume. The outermost of these were probably used as pastedowns in a former binding: both have adhesive residue on their outermost sides, but both have been lifted during later rebinding and conservation work. These were noted as 'a' and 'b' by M.R. James in his Descriptive catalogue (1908).

  • Four parchment endleaves (ff. i-iv) |
  • Quires 1-118 (ff. 1-88)
  • Quire 124 (ff. 89-92) |
  • Four parchment endleaves (ff. 93-96)

1-118 124

No leaf signatures common to the entire volume.

No quire signatures common to the entire volume.

Additions

Quire signatures ('1-12') in the bottom right-hand corner of the recto side of the first leaf of each quire, written in pencil by a hand of the 19th/20th century.

Binding

Fully bound in tawed skin over wood boards. The covering material is undecorated, but there are traces of a title in ink (perhaps 'Liber Nich...') on the front cover. Four sewing supports.

The manuscript has been rebound since M. R. James examined the volume for his Catalogue of the medieval manuscripts belonging to Gonville and Caius which was published in two volumes in 1907-08. The original tawed skin cover has been detached, a new tawed skin cover laid over the original boards, and the original tawed-skin cover was then trimmed to fit within the perimeter of the outer faces of the wood boards and pasted over the newer cover material. The older tawed skin cover is heavily stained and rubbed, and there are large patches where layers of the skin have peeled or scraped off. When M. R. James examined the volume, he noted that it had 'red clasps, broken'; these clasps are not present on the current binding. Two small printed paper labels indicating the current shelfmark of the item are affixed to the spine, the upper label has the number '588' printed in red ink and the lower label has the number '366' printed in black ink.

The current binding has post-1908 paper pastedowns. The front pastedown contains a Gonville and Caius armorial bookplate with the number '588' corrected from '585' handwritten in red ink, and the number '366' handwritten in black ink. The number '585' is written in pencil in the upper outer corner of the pastedown, and is probably an error for the shelfmark '588'. Leaves f. i and f. 96 were probably the pastedowns in an earlier binding, as both have adhesive residue on their outer faces.

The date and the binder of the post-1908 rebinding is not known.

History

Provenance and Acquisition

At Gonville and Caius College by 1600: recorded as no. 162 ('Liber medicus qui procedit secundas literas alphabeti') in Thomas James's Ecloga (number written on upper margin of f. 1r). Not noticed by M.R. James.

Part 1: Scholastic text on Logic (fragment) [Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College, MS 366/588, ff. i-iv, 93-96]

Contents

Language(s): Latin

1. i recto-iv verso, 93r-96r
Commentary on Aristotle's De sophisticis elenchis
Language(s): Latin
Explicit: 96r Dignus est enim operarius mercede sua . Sintque scolarium singuli qui Aristoteli habere grates paruipendit.

Text begins imperfectly.

Text identified and described in R. M. Thomson's Catalogue of Medieval Manuscripts of Latin Commentaries on Aristotle in British Libraries - Volume II: Cambridge. Thomson states that this the commentary covers chs. 30-33 of the De sophisticis elenchis and that the text is 'apparently in the order of the leaves.'

R. M. Thomson, Catalogue of Medieval Manuscripts of Latin Commentaries on Aristotle in British Libraries - Volume II: Cambridge (Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2013)
2. 96r
Medical notes
Language(s): Latin

Including notes on fever and apoplexy.

Physical Description

Secundo Folio: ii recto duplum sed non est
Form: codex
Support: Parchment (HFFH).
Extent: Fragment, comprising two groups of four leaves, each formed of two bifolia: 8 leaves. 235 × 155 mm.

Collation

No leaf signatures.

No quire signatures.

No catchwords.

Condition

The leaves are stained and have small tight creases which make some parts of the text inaccessible. Folios i recto and 96v are both coated in an adhesive residue.

Layout

180 × 130 mm. Ruled in leadpoint, two columns, frame and line, 50 lines to the column. (Folio iv verso ruled in light brown ink). Written above top line.

Hand(s)

Written in a precise and heavily-abbreviated textualis libraria. The text has been corrected, and particular words and clauses have supralinear emendations written in an extremely small hand.

Decoration

Two and three-line initials in red.

History

Origin: 13th century, perhaps first half. ; Probably France.
R. M. Thomson, Catalogue of Medieval Manuscripts of Latin Commentaries on Aristotle in British Libraries - Volume II: Cambridge (Turnhout, Belgium: Brepols, 2013)

Part 2: The antidotarium magnum and other medical texts [Cambridge, Gonville and Caius College, MS 366/588, ff. 1-92]

Contents

Language(s): Latin

1. 1r-91r
Antidotarium magnum
Language(s): Latin
Incipit: 1r Aurea Alexandrinum antidotum faciens ad reuma capitis
Explicit: 91r carui spice . galenge an. est sem. mel quod suficit

This text is described as the Antidotarium nicholai in the M. R. James Catalogue for Gonville and Caius College, but it is in fact, the text known as the Antidotarium magnum. The two texts have frequently been confused in the literature, but the Antidotarium nicholai has a distinctive preface (not present in this manuscript) where a 'Nicholas' addresses his readers and sets out his reasons for assembling a collection of medical recipes.

M. H. Green, 'The Antidotarium Magnum: A Short Description' (2019), esp. n. 19
eTK 0165H (t0031980000)
2. 91r
Note on the medicinal properties of 'mirobolani' (myrobalanum)
Language(s): Latin
Rubric: 91r Mirobolani conditi
Incipit: 91r hoc ordine fiunt . primum accipe chebulos grossos
Explicit: 91r et postea medicinam tam repefactam repone
3. 91r-92r
Medical recipes
Language(s): Latin

Folios 91v-92r have been exposed to liquid and much of the text on the opening is now illegible, but the remains of several medical recipes in Latin in several hands are still partly legible.

Physical Description

Secundo Folio: 2r Antidotum acaristum aliud utilem ad omnem uicium quod infra corpus humanum nascitur
Form: codex
Support: Parchment (HFFH).
Extent: Codex: 92 leaves. 235 × 155 mm.

Collation

  • Quires 1-118 (ff. 1-88)
  • Quire 124 (ff. 89-92)
1-118 124

No leaf signatures

Quires numbered in ink in Roman numerals in the lower margin of the last verso of Quires 7, 9, 10, 12. The medieval quire signatures for Quires 1-6, 8, and 11 have been trimmed away. The remaining quire signatures have small pen-flourishes around the numeral.

No catchwords.

Layout

185 × 105 mm. Ruled in leadpoint, frame and lines, ruling often very faint or latterly erased. Single bounding lines extending the length and the width of the page. Single column, typically 43 lines to the page. Written above top line. Pricked for ruling in outer margins.

Hand(s)

The majority of the text ff. 1r-91r is written by a single scribe writing a neat and well-practiced protogothic bookhand of the mid-12th century.

A scribe has added annotations on ff. 1r, 57v-59r and 91v-92r, in a rather rushed protogothic minuscule of perhaps the mid- or later- 12th century.

Decoration

Each antidote begins with a decorative initial 2-3 lines high in the 'arabesque' style common in English and French manuscripts of this date. Each initial is rendered in red, blue, or green, with decorative pen flourishes in one of the two colours not used as the base-colour of the initial. Due to the structure of the text, there are typically 3-6 decorative initials per page in the manuscript.

Each antidote section terminates in a red wavy line filler where the entries end more than c. 25mm from the right margin of the text box.

Additions

'162' written in the upper margin of f. 1r in brown ink in an early modern hand. Refers to the listing of this manuscript in Thomas James' Ecloga Oxonio-Catabrigiensis (1600), where it is described as 'Liber medicus qui procedit secundas literas alphabeti'.

The word ‘'probatio'’ in ink in a 12th century hand in the lower outer corner of f. 1r.

Marginal annotations in several contemporary hands throughout the text that supply corrections to or comments on the recipes.

History

Origin: 12th century. ; England.

Additional Information

Record Sources

This catalogue record draws on M.R. James, A descriptive catalogue of the manuscripts in the library of Gonville and Caius College, 2 vols. (Cambridge, 1907-1908), p. 415.

Availability

Visitors to Gonville and Caius College who wish to consult Lower Library material are required to apply to the Library in advance of their visit. For information on eligibility and admission procedures see: Gonville and Caius College: Library Information.

Custodial History

Number 162 in T. James, Ecloga (c. 1600)

Number 965 in Bernard, Catalogi librorum manuscriptorum Angliæ et Hiberniæ (c. 1697)

Bibliography

    The Antidotarium magnum: A Short Description, Green, Monica H. (2019, https://www.academia.edu/40255503/The_Antidotarium_magnum_A_Short_Description_2019_)

Funding of Cataloguing

Wellcome

Digital Images

Cambridge Digital Library